On Mar 20, 8:42 am, Antony Sidwell <ant...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> roustk wrote:
> -Wc++-compat would be useful if you had some reason to write code
> compatible with C++ I suppose, but that's not true of most programs, and
> certainly isn't true of Angband.
>
That's actually the first of the list I put together, because I was
working on ticket 458 at the time (get code compiling as both C and C+
+).
While I was adding warnings, the others just sort of grew in there,
which is why one or two were redundant...
--Shanoah


|