Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Angband > Re: feature req...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 19 Topic 6458 of 6642
Post > Topic >>

Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting

by Kenneth 'Bessarion' Boyd <zaimoni@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 17, 2008 at 04:41 AM

On 2008-03-16 22:52:54, Eddie Grove <eddiegrove@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Kenneth 'Bessarion' Boyd  writes:
> 
> > On 2008-03-10 09:38:22, Eddie Grove  wrote:
> >
> > > I was thinking about the munchkin aspects of rangers, and I thought
of the
> > > following scenario.  A ranger with a bow of extra shots can face
Morgoth at
> > > normal speed and not fear a double-move!
> > >
> > > The way energy is currently implemented, each time a char with 4
shots fires
> > > ammo, 25 energy [1/4 normal turn] is used up.  Thus, a monster 4
times as fast
> > > does not get a double-move while you are shooting.  However, if you
are
> > > resting, you use 100 energy at a time and are susceptible to a
double-move
> > > even though you are waiting prepared to attack as M comes through a
bend in
> > > the corridor.
> > >
> > > I think it is bad that you are better off firing arrows into a wall
while
> > > waiting for a monster to round a corner [or walk through it with
killwall].
> > > Surely it is better for resting to use 10 energy at a time to avoid
this.
> >
> > Or even better, one time tick at a time.  [This gets rid of the
Preprare An
> > Ambush command I was thinking of.  Then again, I'm not sure that
should get
> > resting benefits as well.]
> 
> This can be easily implemented in two ways.
> First let's define hitpoints per energy.
> 
> hpe = (regained hitpoints per gameturn) / 100.0

This is currently implemented in V as an emulated fixed-point floating
point. 
You'd have to rescale it to one time tick rather than ten time ticks, but
it
should be possible to get a close approximation when conventing for both
hp and
mana recovery.

However, this misses the point of Prepare an Ambush -- in exchange for
making it
*very* inconvenient to "lie in wait", I want a reasonable chance of
getting a
double-move on the ambushee when the ambusher has the same practical
speed.
 




 19 Posts in Topic:
feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Eddie Grove <eddiegrov  2008-03-10 02:38:22 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Eddie Grove <eddiegrov  2008-03-10 03:04:53 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
pete m <pmac360@[EMAIL  2008-03-10 09:31:17 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Eddie Grove <eddiegrov  2008-03-10 11:00:10 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Billy Bissette <baines  2008-03-11 02:48:45 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Eddie Grove <eddiegrov  2008-03-10 20:06:16 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Psi <si_griffin@[EMAIL  2008-03-10 10:43:01 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Christophe <chris.cava  2008-03-10 12:30:03 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
pete m <pmac360@[EMAIL  2008-03-10 09:33:28 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Nick <nckmccnnll@[EMAI  2008-03-11 09:31:19 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
pete m <pmac360@[EMAIL  2008-03-11 09:38:15 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Kenneth 'Bessarion' Boyd   2008-03-10 14:32:44 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Eddie Grove <eddiegrov  2008-03-10 09:37:28 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Kenneth 'Bessarion' Boyd   2008-03-10 20:17:29 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Eddie Grove <eddiegrov  2008-03-16 15:52:54 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Kenneth 'Bessarion' Boyd   2008-03-17 04:41:55 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
pete m <pmac360@[EMAIL  2008-03-16 16:39:10 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
Eddie Grove <eddiegrov  2008-03-16 16:58:04 
Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting
pete m <pmac360@[EMAIL  2008-03-16 17:18:21 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 23:06:42 CDT 2008.