Re: feature request [V] fine granularity resting

On 2008-03-10 16:37:28, Eddie Grove <eddiegrove@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Kenneth 'Bessarion' Boyd  writes:
> 
> > On 2008-03-10 09:38:22, Eddie Grove  wrote:

> > > I think it is bad that you are better off firing arrows into a wall
while
> > > waiting for a monster to round a corner [or walk through it with
killwall].
> > > Surely it is better for resting to use 10 energy at a time to avoid
this.
> >
> > Or even better, one time tick at a time.  [This gets rid of the
Preprare An
> > Ambush command I was thinking of.  Then again, I'm not sure that
should get
> > resting benefits as well.]
> 
> I understand the point about wanting prep to be different from resting,
but is
> it worth using up an extra precious letter to do so?  'R' is close
enough IMO.

Hmm...additional option to R could work, yes.

This is in the va****ware stage now.  I want a sequence that will error out
in
variants that don't sup****t it.