Re: Cyberpunk v3 - analysis

In message <1149510836.935917.72080@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
Spyke! <ross.winn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
<snip>
>Mike made what he felt was the best choice he could for his family, and
>if that means that he needed to leave RTG to seed for a while that is
>his choice. He is a good man, and we have to remember that.
>
Sure, his company, his choice. (And Family first)
>People did not lose interest, and in some weird way it seems v3 is
>selling as well as 2020 did in many markets. That doesn't change my
>opinion of the game, but it is a fact.

Can't comment - not seen it this side of the water, but Gaming is... if 
not dead, then very quiet. Few shops stock gaming materials - and then 
its very restricted choices.
>
>I think Mike has an inherent optimism in his psyche that makes writing
>cyberpunk much more difficult. I know that it does forme now compared
>to ten years ago. He has also become somewhat removed from the
>material, or it seems so.
>
You can't be a parent and a pessimist, but its hard to justify calling 
the new game Cyberpunk. Maybe Mekton Alpha would have been better? ;-)
-- 
Ian Birchenough