Mere moments before death, tussock <scrub@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hastily
scrawled:
>Dale Friesen wrote:
>> Del Rio wrote:
>>
>>> I bet the
>>> idea behind the GSL is going to be, "let's let people create stuff
that
>>> requires you to own D&D 4e books to play." I'm betting that the only
>>> version of the 4e rules that anyone will be allowed to publish will be
>>> in the D&D 4e core books, thus making them requirements in order to
>>> play any game that is based on the 4e equivalent of d20.
>>
>> Yes, I expect that to be the case, too.
>>
>> But is that so unreasonable?
>
> Yes. It's bad for their customers, bad for RPG writers, bad for the
>game stores, bad for the popularity of the hobby, and very bad for them
>in the long run due to all those factors.
How did the RPG hobby ever survive for 30 years before WotC and the
OGL in the first place?
--
DISCLAIMER : WARNING: RULE # 196 is X-rated in that to calculate L,
use X = [(C2/10)^2], and RULE # 193 which is NOT meant to be read by
kids, since RULE # 187 EXPLAINS homo***uality mathematically, using
modifier G @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11.
"I always feel left out when someone *else* gets killfiled."
--Terry Austin
|
