I wrote:
If you or anyone else wanted to discuss different
concepts, you were free to come up with your own
model, and define your own concepts and suggest
your own labels for them.
To clarify, I don't mean to imply that you didn't do this; you did on
a number of occasions, and I think those discussions were useful.
Also, I went back and checked some of the discussions involving Brett
Evill, and I think he did some of this too - and in the posts I
reread, he seemed happy to use terms like "realism" and "faithfulness
to the setting" that did not conflict with the threefold.
I do now remember that the way he came across to me was as a "one true
way" person, and he seemed unwilling to accept that others, including
myself, might actually dislike some of the things that he seemed to
think everyone should want in their roleplaying.
Warren J. Dew
|
