Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Debate > Re: GM-controll...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 58 of 108 Topic 327 of 369
Post > Topic >>

Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points

by Peter Knutsen <peter@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 8, 2007 at 02:53 AM

psychohist wrote:
> Brian Gleichman posts, in part:
> 
>   Few police departments today issue revolvers. Starting
>   in the 80s, automatics became the standard choice. Some
>   departments leave it up to the individual  (within
>   guidelines) and you do see a wheel gun now and then,
>   but they are rare at least in OK, TX areas I travel.
> 
> My understanding is that this was a result of increased reliability of
> semiautomatic pistols.  In other words, Peter's suggestion may be
> dated, but wouldn't necessarily be incorrect, for example for a game
> set in earlier decades.

My personal sweet spot for Modern Action RPG campaigns is the mid 1980s,
because that was when I was a kid, and I have fond memories of a lot of
movies (some might remember that the system's original title, or working
title, was Action Movie RPG - I changed it mostly because it made people 
think of John Woo, which is wrong (and who is wrong, on all possible 
levels)).

But really, the system should be able to handle any action setting. In a
space opera setting, you'd need to add futuristic firearms (and energy
rapiers, although these should be easy), but the character subtype
infrastructure is already in place, with subtypes such as the
Special/Cyborg, Skilled/Spacer, Skilled/Hacker and Skilled/Advanced.

Anything from mid 19th century to very near future should be doable
as-is (just delete or ignore firearms that are too advanced). Anything 
earlier would require the addition ot period-appropriate firearms. A 
campaign set in a pre-gunpowder setting should be doable, because I have 
given quite a bit of attention to unarmed combat and melee weapon combat 
(because both of these are intrinsically cool), although probably more 
than half of the combat rules will deal with firearms, so one would miss 
out on some system elements.

Anyway, if automatic pistol reliability has gone up, I'd need to mention
that somewhere in the rules, but it was my assumption that handgun
technology, in the sense of pistols and revolvers, hadn't really changed
much in nearly a century. So it's very useful and valuable to get that 
kind of assumption squashed...

-- 
Peter Knutsen
sagatafl.org
 




 108 Posts in Topic:
GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-07-11 14:21:46 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-07-11 14:20:24 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-07-21 15:47:07 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-07-21 09:47:26 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-07-22 23:10:03 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-07-23 08:57:38 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-08 03:18:15 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-07-11 06:42:28 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-07-18 05:45:53 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-07-21 16:00:28 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-07-21 10:08:31 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-08 03:31:12 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-07-22 01:53:51 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-07-23 00:43:30 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-07-23 08:37:00 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-07-23 15:42:04 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-07-23 20:59:49 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-08 03:44:19 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-07-28 01:57:04 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-07-27 23:10:37 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-07-24 07:05:37 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-07-26 00:33:31 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-07-26 06:15:51 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-07-26 07:45:47 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
David Alex Lamb <dalam  2007-07-28 11:10:12 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-07-28 11:10:00 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-07-26 06:23:09 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-07-26 20:40:54 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-07-27 08:11:21 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Irina Rempt <irina@[EM  2007-07-27 17:19:15 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-07-27 09:28:44 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Irina Rempt <irina@[EM  2007-07-27 21:15:11 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
David Alex Lamb <dalam  2007-07-28 11:20:56 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-07-28 11:18:40 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-07-28 13:13:47 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-17 01:33:44 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
David Alex Lamb <dalam  2007-09-01 23:41:42 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-08-10 06:33:21 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-07-27 16:41:41 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-07-27 09:53:31 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-07-27 13:00:05 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
David Alex Lamb <dalam  2007-07-28 11:23:22 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-07-28 11:04:34 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-07-27 23:26:38 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-07-27 18:39:13 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-07-28 19:59:15 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-07-28 15:10:43 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-07-30 15:13:19 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-07-30 08:23:21 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
George W Harris <gharr  2007-07-30 16:41:39 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
psychohist <psychohist  2007-08-06 13:32:54 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-08-07 07:05:26 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-08 02:56:03 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-08-07 09:06:48 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-08 02:53:14 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
psychohist <psychohist  2007-08-06 15:09:40 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-08-07 07:14:15 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-08 02:53:04 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-07 07:17:09 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
psychohist <psychohist  2007-08-07 07:55:13 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
psychohist <psychohist  2007-08-07 10:05:15 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-07 11:02:47 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-08-10 05:49:07 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-08 07:51:01 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-11 05:44:08 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-08 07:58:18 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-11 05:51:00 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-08-13 18:06:48 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-09-19 01:11:12 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
David Alex Lamb <dalam  2007-09-02 00:04:43 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-08 07:59:29 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-11 05:51:32 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-08-13 18:09:57 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-09-19 01:12:19 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-08 08:07:14 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
psychohist <psychohist  2007-08-08 09:34:03 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-11 06:06:26 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
psychohist <psychohist  2007-08-09 17:10:12 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-10 06:29:40 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-08-11 06:13:54 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-10 06:35:07 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
psychohist <psychohist  2007-08-10 09:54:54 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-08-11 12:43:57 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-08-11 12:50:32 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
"gleichman" <  2007-08-13 18:19:19 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-08-14 18:40:53 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-09-19 01:19:57 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-09-19 01:02:21 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-09-24 00:29:50 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
psychohist <psychohist  2007-08-12 16:18:23 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-09-19 01:09:04 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-14 11:03:42 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-08-14 20:20:53 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-14 12:42:53 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-08-15 00:18:41 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-08-15 16:29:16 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-09-19 01:20:46 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-15 07:58:26 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-08-15 23:38:01 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-08-17 03:39:43 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
arromdee@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-17 21:12:54 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-16 06:38:56 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-17 06:04:38 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-08-17 20:30:09 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-08-17 12:36:34 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-09-19 08:21:38 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-09-19 08:22:57 
Re: GM-controlled Bad Luck points
gleichman <fox1_217@[E  2007-09-19 08:34:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 11:22:33 CDT 2008.