by "gleichman" <fox1_217.nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jul 28, 2007 at 09:13 AM
"Ben Finney" <bignose+hates-spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:871wesg1jb.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> That's why I suggested it would be far more interesting for a GM to
> have their play group *****s the GM's style by these classifications.
> One could get a fresh idea of how one's behaviour is perceived.
Depends.
IME most players aren't interested in that sort of thing. For example, my
favorite GM years ago found the original Champions article and the
reaction
to it was basically the same for everyone playing in his group. "That's
cute... so what are we going to do tonight".
Gamers that are interested in the theory side of things (even something as
light as this) are rare. One of simple examples of that is the fact that
very few (I don't remember any) of the posters here over the years had any
regular from their group also posting.
