Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Debate > Re: Lethality o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 313 of 369
Post > Topic >>

Re: Lethality of events

by Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 24, 2007 at 07:32 AM

psychohist <psychohist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> [example of "selfish needs"]
> A man is starting to get hungry, and sees a bakery.  The baker's
> assistant is watching the shop and selling bread.  The man beats the
> assistant to a pulp so she cannot interfere, then takes the bread and
> eats it to assuage his hunger.
>
> [example of "enjoyment"]
> A man is starting to get hungry, and sees a bakery.  The baker's
> assistant is watching the shop and selling bread.  The man beats the
> assistant to a pulp because he enjoys her pain, but leaves the bread
> alone because he's in the mood for cheese.

Neither of those are excusable. I see both as equally evil.

Intent does matter, but "because I was hungry" and "because it was
fun" are both poor excuses for violence, and both actions equally
unjustified.

-- 
 \        "To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make |
  `\     you something else is the greatest accomplishment."  -- Ralph |
_o__)                                                    Waldo Emerson |
Ben Finney
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: Lethality of events
psychohist <psychohist  2007-05-23 08:29:12 
Re: Lethality of events
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-05-23 14:04:02 
Re: Lethality of events
Ben Finney <bignose+ha  2007-05-24 07:32:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 21:26:16 CDT 2008.