Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Debate > Re: Campaign pa...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 55 of 68 Topic 289 of 369
Post > Topic >>

Re: Campaign pacing

by "gleichman" <fox1_217@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 10, 2007 at 09:17 AM

On Apr 10, 9:39 am, "DougL" <lampert.d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> One of these things
> is clearly better than the other unless the GM is deliberately ****ing
> with the world to have Ravens show up with im****tant messages for me
> every 5 minutes.

I hope you don't mind that I object to your use of the f**king to
describe my gaming style. But if you wish to take this to straight to
a flame war, you've made an excellent start.

Point Systems are (or should be) designed primary to be used
specifically to justify and guide the campaign genre by means of
character (and item in some systems) construction. That's the gaming
contract they are designed for. They are not designed for any other
style and generally will not work with them.


For example, if I were to use HERO to run a Prydain game the following
things would happen:

Speak with Anything would be disallowed. That ability doesn't exist in
that setting. Very few characters on concept could buy "Speak with
Ravens", typically only those of a fair folk background.

And yes, Ravens would have rather common interaction with the
character as a result of how such a character spent his points. It
would likely be a major genre highlight for that character in fact.
This is the whole point of buying the ability in the first place.


Now lets say I was (IMO stupid enough) to attempt to run an open
setting where both "Speak with Everything" and Speak with Ravens
appears together. I require the former to be brought as Telepathy
likely at the 10d6 level, No End Cost (+1/2), Only for Communication
(-1/2) for 50 points.

Meanwhile I'd count "Speak with Raven" as a specific language for 3
points (it would work like speak wookie in a Star Wars game). Special
effect in HERO is wide open you know.

Generally there's no problem with relative effectiveness because the
latter can be afford while the former is a major and likely character
budget breaking buy.

Where things turn really stupid is when you attempt to mix a group
that insists on buying both abilities for different charaters. Any
group of players where the niche of one (speak with Ravens) is
completely contained in the niche of another who's more effective at
that niche (Speak with everything) is asking for campaign failure no
matter the system. Blaming the point buy construction is doing nothing
but deflecting blame from where it belongs- on the players/GM.


If you or Mary are not willing to play the game towards the ends in
which the system was designed, that's fine. But the fault isn't with
the game system. It's with yourself. Find another game and stop
whining about systems that work perfectly for those who understand and
accept how they are meant to be played.
 




 68 Posts in Topic:
Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-14 20:16:05 
Re: Campaign pacing
"gleichman" <  2007-03-14 13:52:37 
Re: Campaign pacing
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-03-24 09:08:16 
Re: Campaign pacing
Brandon Blackmoor <bbl  2007-03-28 14:12:57 
Re: Campaign pacing
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2007-03-29 04:39:28 
Re: Campaign pacing
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-03-14 22:19:55 
Re: Campaign pacing
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-03-14 22:26:27 
Re: Campaign pacing
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-03-14 22:28:48 
Re: Campaign pacing
Gary Johnson <zzjohnsg  2007-03-15 13:41:57 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-20 19:15:00 
Re: Campaign pacing
Gary Johnson <zzjohnsg  2007-03-23 10:18:15 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-23 17:43:23 
Re: Campaign pacing
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-21 01:53:27 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-20 20:49:00 
Re: Campaign pacing
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-21 20:56:44 
Re: Campaign pacing
dalamb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-03-22 02:57:38 
Re: Campaign pacing
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-22 18:36:07 
Re: Campaign pacing
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-03-22 09:49:20 
Re: Campaign pacing
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-23 15:47:59 
Re: Campaign pacing
Rick Pikul <rwpikul@[E  2007-03-23 11:50:51 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-22 18:52:50 
Re: Campaign pacing
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-23 19:02:59 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-23 17:54:00 
Re: Campaign pacing
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-25 04:05:44 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-28 19:34:00 
Re: Campaign pacing
"DougL" <lam  2007-03-29 21:59:01 
Re: Campaign pacing
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-30 07:05:58 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-30 16:59:58 
Re: Campaign pacing
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-30 22:08:10 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-31 14:20:51 
Re: Campaign pacing
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-31 11:53:17 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-02 21:14:09 
Re: Campaign pacing
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-04-02 22:55:31 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-03 20:32:49 
Re: Campaign pacing
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-04-04 22:53:57 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-03 22:32:08 
Re: Campaign pacing
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-04-04 23:37:54 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-05 20:47:13 
Re: Campaign pacing
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-04-05 20:05:54 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-06 19:30:56 
Re: Campaign pacing
Rick Pikul <rwpikul@[E  2007-04-07 00:16:06 
Re: Campaign pacing
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-04-10 16:53:24 
Re: Campaign pacing
arromdee@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-10 18:28:19 
Re: Campaign pacing
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-04-03 00:26:40 
Re: Campaign pacing
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-04-02 23:19:41 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-03 18:17:49 
Re: Campaign pacing
George W Harris <gharr  2007-04-24 07:47:26 
Re: Campaign pacing
"DougL" <lam  2007-03-30 06:24:02 
Re: Campaign pacing
"DougL" <lam  2007-03-31 07:58:52 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-01 03:45:37 
Re: Campaign pacing
"psychohist" &l  2007-04-04 09:39:42 
Re: Campaign pacing
"psychohist" &l  2007-04-05 15:36:12 
Re: Campaign pacing
"gleichman" <  2007-04-06 12:54:09 
Re: Campaign pacing
"DougL" <lam  2007-04-10 07:39:07 
Re: Campaign pacing
"gleichman" <  2007-04-10 09:17:41 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-10 17:16:08 
Re: Campaign pacing
arromdee@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-10 18:30:04 
Re: Campaign pacing
"gleichman" <  2007-04-10 11:27:06 
Re: Campaign pacing
"gleichman" <  2007-04-10 11:34:49 
Re: Campaign pacing
"Rick Pikul" &l  2007-04-11 05:19:51 
Re: Campaign pacing
"psychohist" &l  2007-04-12 09:47:59 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-13 00:01:22 
Re: Campaign pacing
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-04-12 23:43:39 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-13 05:40:33 
Re: Campaign pacing
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-04-13 02:08:27 
Re: Campaign pacing
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-13 21:10:37 
Re: Campaign pacing
arromdee@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-13 15:15:56 
Re: Campaign pacing
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-04-13 16:58:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 3:44:04 CDT 2008.