Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Debate > Re: mechanics o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 28 of 179 Topic 286 of 369
Post > Topic >>

Re: mechanics of surprise

by mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mary K. Kuhner) Feb 28, 2007 at 11:41 PM

In article <T6lFh.18282$j7.366880@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Russell Wallace  <russell.no.spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Simon makes some very good points here: the op****tunity for a perfect 
>ambush isn't necessarily easy to come by.

>Consider the "we lie in wait outside the enemy's cave and whack them as 
>they emerge" scenario. Yes if you can pull that off, and if the two 
>sides were roughly equal in strength, then the ambushers should have a 
>very good chance of scoring a TPK with few or no casualties on their own 
>side.

>Consider the setup, however. An isolated cave with no neighbors or 
>passersby to get suspicious and alert the authorities - convenient. But 
>then how do the ambushers know where their enemy's hideout is, let alone 
>their schedule?

When my PCs recently needed to pull off such an ambush, they came to
town a week early and investigated questions like "How are these
guys getting fed?"  There were only a few businesses in town that
could cater for a group the size of the enemy's team (it would have
been harder to track this in a city) and questioning the
caterer's low-level employees gave the PCs some idea of the enemy's
location, schedule, and approximate numbers.

A lot of additional information came from staging a preliminary
attack (by two dinosaur skeletons, as it happens) on the road.
This told the PCs that the foe would tele****t instantly if spooked,
and also revealed the foe's use of baboons as forward scouts.  The
PCs then waited several days (in case of heightened readiness)
before staging the actual attack.

Catching and questioning one low-level foe is an incredibly
powerful technique, even without magic and especially with it
(Detect Thoughts/Zone of Truth/Charm Person in D&D).  It would be
harder in a more lawful area but in a remote location like this
putative cave, the law is unlikely to be able to react effectively.
And if the PCs are ruthless, they can kill the victim afterwards.
(If they are necromancers, killing the victim beforehands works
fairly well too!)

Attempts to do this to the PCs in return would have been more
difficult because they were not locals, and were not trying to
operate a business (as their foes were).  On their home turf,
where they *do* operate a business and have scheduled appointments,
they'd be rather more vulnerable than their foe, and I believe
would fall to an attack very similar in kind to what I just
outlined.  I honestly don't know how to prevent it.  The location
of their hideout is known and they cannot afford to guard the
entrance constantly.  (At much higher level they may start
Tele****ting in and out, and dispense with having a door, but they
can't do it now.)  Sending a scout out might save the group at
the cost of certainly losing the scout, and with only 6 PCs this
is not very affordable.  Low-level hirelings cannot deal with
attackers who are stealthy or invisible or shapechanged or just
blending in with the urban crowds.  And it is next to impossible to
do business without ever establi****ng a pattern that can be
used to ambush you.

Mary Kuhner mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




 179 Posts in Topic:
mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-21 22:26:49 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-02-21 16:39:00 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Eric P. <ericpNOSPAM06  2007-02-22 05:18:52 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Rick Pikul <rwpikul@[E  2007-02-22 01:22:25 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-22 20:29:25 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Rick Pikul <rwpikul@[E  2007-02-23 02:24:57 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-22 14:46:49 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-23 00:06:43 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-02-24 00:47:54 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-23 07:58:52 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-23 20:44:53 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-23 19:50:07 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-02-24 18:21:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-24 11:23:20 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-27 22:39:50 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-02-23 20:19:39 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-24 23:38:45 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-25 06:10:11 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-02-25 00:57:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Klaus Mittag <klaus_mi  2007-02-25 17:29:40 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-25 16:51:08 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Brandon Blackmoor <bbl  2007-02-25 01:16:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-02-25 00:57:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-25 01:32:19 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-02-25 09:04:43 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-02-28 16:52:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-28 19:55:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-28 23:41:26 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 13:46:01 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 22:11:16 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 06:50:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 08:03:58 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-06 18:36:05 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 21:47:01 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 12:37:43 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-07 07:25:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-07 11:20:17 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-01 13:46:55 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-02 03:00:10 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 13:55:27 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 13:04:19 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 21:08:54 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-03-05 18:03:10 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-02 07:46:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-02 08:21:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-04 13:23:24 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-05 00:47:58 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-04 13:47:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Indiana Joe <indianajo  2007-03-04 19:48:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-06 01:35:43 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-04 20:40:08 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-05 17:29:28 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-05 20:22:38 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-04 20:43:28 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-06 09:25:59 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-05 10:00:15 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-05 21:43:40 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-05 14:38:32 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-05 21:14:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-05 12:47:25 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-05 13:02:41 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-05 16:16:34 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-06 01:25:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-05 14:19:44 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-05 23:41:55 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-06 18:30:03 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Gary Johnson <zzjohnsg  2007-03-06 16:44:54 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 01:32:53 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Thomas Lindgren <*****  2007-03-06 13:16:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 04:37:39 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 08:08:13 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-06 18:32:26 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 13:20:18 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-06 16:09:21 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-06 19:10:17 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 21:50:28 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-07 07:32:50 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-07 06:41:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-07 06:41:19 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-07 09:32:11 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-07 11:46:32 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-07 18:30:22 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-03-08 16:52:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-07 11:02:56 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"DougL" <lam  2007-03-07 11:10:37 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-07 19:35:16 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-07 11:18:58 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-07 15:08:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-08 00:44:58 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-07 13:27:26 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"DougL" <lam  2007-03-08 08:26:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-22 21:19:48 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-22 21:50:44 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-23 08:41:08 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-23 08:47:26 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-23 20:51:34 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-23 13:33:03 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-25 06:25:42 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-27 22:51:54 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-27 23:40:05 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-28 00:36:25 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-02-28 15:17:19 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-25 08:25:06 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-26 20:22:38 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-25 09:31:00 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-26 20:30:12 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 13:22:46 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 21:39:48 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 04:06:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-26 12:57:31 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-02-26 13:29:32 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-02-28 02:08:22 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-02 02:30:36 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-27 20:46:51 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-28 09:09:39 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-28 19:01:57 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-03 02:34:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-02 20:59:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-03 21:47:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-03-03 10:39:11 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-03 12:12:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-04 16:57:06 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Klaus Mittag <klaus_mi  2007-03-04 11:50:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-28 06:25:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-28 09:31:40 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-28 19:07:12 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-28 11:49:09 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-28 12:40:18 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-02-28 12:53:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-28 21:34:14 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 14:57:00 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 19:20:16 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 21:58:30 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 22:44:05 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-07 06:33:40 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-03-01 23:57:05 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-02-28 13:55:53 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-28 22:22:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-01 15:18:08 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 16:23:48 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 16:34:39 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 17:55:18 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-02 02:47:42 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-03 01:12:49 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-28 16:43:55 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 06:39:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 07:20:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 17:58:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-01 18:46:42 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 19:04:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-01 19:32:18 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 19:55:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-02 06:22:01 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-02 18:16:44 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-02 10:53:20 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-02 11:47:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-02 11:00:01 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 07:33:32 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 18:22:03 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-03 02:03:13 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-02 17:26:52 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"DougL" <lam  2007-03-01 09:19:23 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-03-01 17:30:51 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-01 09:34:58 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-01 10:32:57 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 18:36:30 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 11:18:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 11:34:21 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 19:49:39 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 11:38:25 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 19:54:15 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 12:12:20 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 20:49:06 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-02 06:57:28 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-02 07:16:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-02 09:47:20 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-02 11:43:50 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-03 10:27:44 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-03-03 21:54:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 11:24:57 CDT 2008.