Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Debate > Re: mechanics o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 23 of 179 Topic 286 of 369
Post > Topic >>

Re: mechanics of surprise

by Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 25, 2007 at 12:57 AM

Mere moments before death, Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
hastily scrawled:

>On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:19:39 -0600, Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>>Mere moments before death, mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Mary K.
>>Kuhner) hastily scrawled:
>>
>>>My GM, reading over my shoulder, says "In a match between even and
>>>roughly similar forces, should surprise determine the victor
completely?"
>>
>>Yes, it should.  This is true in real life and there's no reason it
>>shouldn't be true in the game.
>
>True in real life, I'll grant, but there are good reasons why one
>might not want it to be true in a game.

Outside of assumption clash, I can't really think of any good ones.

>>Surprise is a hefty weapon and can level the playing field for a
>>weaker foe.  As a GM, you should use it cautiously, typically to make
>>an encounter with a weaker foe more interesting.  As players you
>>should be prepared for it and try to be the ones using it to your
>>advantage, not the other way around.
>
>Well, in some styles of play the GM *can't* "use it cautiously" - the
>GM doesn't have that kind of storytelling control, but instead is
>obligated to play the foes as competently as possible. Which means
>that if surprise is a hefty weapon, the foes will try to exploit it as
>best they can.

I would submit that in those styles of play, this is "Not a Problem".

>And as a player it can get unpleasant to always have to play
>characters who are obsessed over surprise; over gaining suprise over
>their opponents and over not being surprised themselves.
>
>So in a game, it might well be a good thing to depower surprise,
>making it unrealisticly weak as a weapon in order to promote in-game
>fun. 

Which would be just as unacceptable to me in a game where the GM
wasn't allowed to use surprise cautiously.



-- 
DISCLAIMER : WARNING: RULE # 196 is X-rated in that to calculate L,
use X = [(C2/10)^2], and RULE # 193 which is NOT meant to be read by
kids, since RULE # 187 EXPLAINS homo***uality mathematically, using
modifier G @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 11.

"I always feel left out when someone *else* gets killfiled."
                           --Terry Austin
 




 179 Posts in Topic:
mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-21 22:26:49 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-02-21 16:39:00 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Eric P. <ericpNOSPAM06  2007-02-22 05:18:52 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Rick Pikul <rwpikul@[E  2007-02-22 01:22:25 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-22 20:29:25 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Rick Pikul <rwpikul@[E  2007-02-23 02:24:57 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-22 14:46:49 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-23 00:06:43 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-02-24 00:47:54 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-23 07:58:52 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-23 20:44:53 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-23 19:50:07 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-02-24 18:21:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-24 11:23:20 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-27 22:39:50 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-02-23 20:19:39 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-24 23:38:45 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-25 06:10:11 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-02-25 00:57:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Klaus Mittag <klaus_mi  2007-02-25 17:29:40 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-25 16:51:08 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Brandon Blackmoor <bbl  2007-02-25 01:16:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-02-25 00:57:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-25 01:32:19 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-02-25 09:04:43 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-02-28 16:52:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-28 19:55:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-28 23:41:26 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 13:46:01 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 22:11:16 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 06:50:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 08:03:58 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-06 18:36:05 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 21:47:01 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 12:37:43 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-07 07:25:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-07 11:20:17 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-01 13:46:55 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-02 03:00:10 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 13:55:27 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 13:04:19 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 21:08:54 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-03-05 18:03:10 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-02 07:46:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-02 08:21:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-04 13:23:24 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-05 00:47:58 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-04 13:47:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Indiana Joe <indianajo  2007-03-04 19:48:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-06 01:35:43 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-04 20:40:08 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-05 17:29:28 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-05 20:22:38 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-04 20:43:28 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-06 09:25:59 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-05 10:00:15 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-05 21:43:40 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-05 14:38:32 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-05 21:14:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-05 12:47:25 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-05 13:02:41 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-05 16:16:34 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-06 01:25:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-05 14:19:44 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-05 23:41:55 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-06 18:30:03 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Gary Johnson <zzjohnsg  2007-03-06 16:44:54 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 01:32:53 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Thomas Lindgren <*****  2007-03-06 13:16:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 04:37:39 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 08:08:13 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-06 18:32:26 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 13:20:18 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-06 16:09:21 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-06 19:10:17 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 21:50:28 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-07 07:32:50 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-07 06:41:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-07 06:41:19 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-07 09:32:11 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-07 11:46:32 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-07 18:30:22 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-03-08 16:52:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-07 11:02:56 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"DougL" <lam  2007-03-07 11:10:37 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-07 19:35:16 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-07 11:18:58 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-07 15:08:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-08 00:44:58 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-07 13:27:26 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"DougL" <lam  2007-03-08 08:26:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-02-22 21:19:48 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-22 21:50:44 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-23 08:41:08 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-23 08:47:26 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-23 20:51:34 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-23 13:33:03 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-25 06:25:42 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-27 22:51:54 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-27 23:40:05 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-28 00:36:25 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-02-28 15:17:19 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-25 08:25:06 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-26 20:22:38 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-25 09:31:00 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-26 20:30:12 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 13:22:46 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 21:39:48 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 04:06:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-26 12:57:31 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-02-26 13:29:32 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-02-28 02:08:22 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-02 02:30:36 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-27 20:46:51 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-28 09:09:39 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-28 19:01:57 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-03 02:34:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-02 20:59:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-03 21:47:47 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-03-03 10:39:11 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-03 12:12:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-04 16:57:06 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Klaus Mittag <klaus_mi  2007-03-04 11:50:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-28 06:25:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-28 09:31:40 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-28 19:07:12 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-02-28 11:49:09 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-28 12:40:18 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-02-28 12:53:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-28 21:34:14 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 14:57:00 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 19:20:16 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-06 21:58:30 
Re: mechanics of surprise
John Morrow <morrow@[E  2007-03-06 22:44:05 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-07 06:33:40 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-03-01 23:57:05 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-02-28 13:55:53 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-02-28 22:22:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-01 15:18:08 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 16:23:48 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 16:34:39 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 17:55:18 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Erol K. Bayburt <ErolB  2007-03-02 02:47:42 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-03 01:12:49 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-02-28 16:43:55 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 06:39:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 07:20:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 17:58:35 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-01 18:46:42 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 19:04:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Neelakantan Krishnaswami   2007-03-01 19:32:18 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 19:55:33 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-02 06:22:01 
Re: mechanics of surprise
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-03-02 18:16:44 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-02 10:53:20 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-02 11:47:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-02 11:00:01 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 07:33:32 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 18:22:03 
Re: mechanics of surprise
tussock <scrub@[EMAIL   2007-03-03 02:03:13 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-02 17:26:52 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"DougL" <lam  2007-03-01 09:19:23 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-03-01 17:30:51 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-01 09:34:58 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-01 10:32:57 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 18:36:30 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 11:18:02 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 11:34:21 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 19:49:39 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 11:38:25 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 19:54:15 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-01 12:12:20 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Russell Wallace <russe  2007-03-01 20:49:06 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-02 06:57:28 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"Will in New Haven&q  2007-03-02 07:16:04 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-02 09:47:20 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"gleichman" <  2007-03-02 11:43:50 
Re: mechanics of surprise
"psychohist" &l  2007-03-03 10:27:44 
Re: mechanics of surprise
Ed Chauvin IV <edcfour  2007-03-03 21:54:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 14:58:39 CDT 2008.