Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Debate > Re: Pros and co...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 7 Topic 285 of 369
Post > Topic >>

Re: Pros and cons on on-line gaming fora?

by Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-hazred@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 7, 2007 at 04:12 PM

Simon Smith wrote:
> 

  [re: online gaming fora]

> Would anyone who has played in them (or, like me, considered and 
> rejected playing in them) care to share their views on what they're 
> like? What do they do well, and what do they do badly? I believe 
> someone (Mary?) may even have posted links to a couple of them, but I 
> can't even remember enough details for a search to find that post 
> again.

  I've been playing in a Cthulhu-based forum
(http://www.callofcthulhu.org.uk/)
for about a year or so now.  The
biggest lessons I've learned from this are;

   - the pace of advancement is very slow.  Most participants make only
     about 3-4 posts per week, and the need to wait to hear how other 
     people or the GM are responding to your actions means that it takes
     considerably longer to get anywhere.  In the one campaign I'm still
     active in, we've spent more than 1000 posts and about one full 
     year real-time playing out the events of a *single* day (a hectic
     one, granted).  And that day isn't done yet, and probably will not 
     be for several more months real-time.

     In a face-to-face campaign, these events would have filled two,
     *maybe* three 4-hour sessions.  Thus you are looking at taking 
     about a month (real-time) to accomplish what you could in a single
     hour or so of a face-to-face campaign.  (Thus I feel that people
     running the equivalent of the Masks of Nyarlathotep campaign 
     online, frex, are nuts.)

     (It is possible that this can be sped up if all participants are
     willing to give up some authorial privileges to allow the GM or 
     other players to extrapolate ones responses or the responses of
     NPCs to ones actions, but I haven't really seen any successful
     implementation of this in any of the hosted campaigns.)

   - you've got to be *very* careful about who you allow into a campaign
     (or from a player's perspective, which campaigns you join).  The
     fora equivalent of a newsgroup troll or immature player can really
     ruin things for everyone.  (And to give an example of the 
     opposite point of view, the first campaign I joined crashed-and-
     burned after it became clear that the GM was trying to recreate
     a Gamera movie, and couldn't deal with variations from what the
     characters in the film attempted.)

   - there's nothing like watching the campaign grind to a halt for a 
     week or so because of the unexpected vacation plans of a particular 
     player, or because someone got too busy to post for a few days.  
     Maintaining plot momentum is very difficult.

   - perhaps for all of the above reasons, participation is *extremely*
     flaky.  I've seen two campaigns die because the GM disappeared
     without a word, and the turnover rate is atrocious.  Players
     disappear constantly without notice.  GMs are thus forced to deal
     with either continually slotting in-and-out new characters, or 
     trying to find replacement players for existing characters and then 
     worrying about radical changes in tone.  It must be very tempting 
     to have key NPCs remain under GM control, but that in itself is 
     prone to abuse (railroading) in my experience.

  (Aside from online fora, I've also dabbled with chat-based online
games and PBeM ones, but never had a successful experience in either
because of similar issues.  As none of my trials really ever got off the
ground, however, it is quite possible my experiences with these media
are idiosyncratic.)

  On the other hand, it *is* possible to have a reasonably-decent time,
provided (as with a face-to-face game) you've got the right combination
of players and GM.  Even so, the slow pace means that I cannot imagine
even the best of online campaigns rivalling a decent face-to-face one. 
Would a wiki-based one be any different?  I don't know.

  If you do go ahead, I wish you all the best and can provide only one
other bit of advice.  If you are looking for an online random number
generator, I'd recommend the Invisible Castle
(http://www.invisiblecastle.com/).
 It is a robust generator that keeps
track of rolls made for a particular character, so you can watch for
signs of cheating if such concerns you.

  Cheers,
    Biff


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
  "All around me darkness gathers, fading is the sun that shone, 
  we must speak of other matters, you can be me when I'm gone..."
                - SANDMAN #67, Neil Gaiman
-------------------------------------------------------------------
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Pros and cons on on-line gaming fora?
Simon Smith <simon_smi  2007-02-07 02:24:14 
Re: Pros and cons on on-line gaming fora?
"Nicole Massey"  2007-02-06 20:49:44 
Re: Pros and cons on on-line gaming fora?
Keran <keranlonglost@[  2007-02-07 20:08:30 
Re: Pros and cons on on-line gaming fora?
Beowulf Bolt <abd.al-h  2007-02-07 16:12:50 
Re: Pros and cons on on-line gaming fora?
mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-02-07 19:12:36 
Re: Pros and cons on on-line gaming fora?
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-08 00:09:50 
Re: Pros and cons on on-line gaming fora?
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-09 22:08:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 15:03:12 CDT 2008.