Re: what is it about angels?

"Mary K. Kuhner" <mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:epo2pf$4k9$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The PCs were confronted by a leonal who demanded that they leave the
> Evil members of the group behind.

1. I can't believe that a Paladin would ever oppose an Angel's ruling. 
Should have been lost of the Paladin's status then and there.

2. Mixed Good and Evil groups, with a Paladin present none the less. I
don't 
know about 3.x, but that also would have been a Paladin loss of status 
offense in the old days. Silly idea besides, "Hi everyone, we're Good Guys

sworn to uphold truth, justice and the american way. Oh, and we've picked
an 
Evil selfish and murderous bastard as our Leader. We be smart."

3. CR issues? Don't care, will leave that to the D&D fans to debate.

For this to work, Paladins would have be altered from the rules (unless
3.x 
has already altered them), and Good and Evil would have to be toned down
to 
"somewhat nice" and "somewhat naughty". Which from the description, seems
to 
have been the case.

But it makes mush of your wish to run the game by the rules.