Re: session re****t

In article <slrnerflfv.rl2.neelk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Neelakantan Krishnaswami  <neelk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>In article <ep8a93$3an$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Del Rio wrote:
 
>> Well, not *necesarily*, though...  I haven't reviewed it, but
>> it might be bad design or it might be the fact that a 17th
>> level "caster" isn't necessarily equivalent to an actual 17th
>> level adventurer with all his magical equipment.

>That's what I wondered, but when I looked at, its stats and special
>abilities give it effective better equipment than a PC cleric of
>equivalent level. 

That was certainly our conclusion when we saw it in action in
v3.0 (City of the Spider Queen).  The PCs summoned two of them
and they were considerably more powerful than the PC cleric.  Much 
of a PC's equipment is meant to cover vulnerabilities which the 
angels cover in other ways (SR, DR, immunities).  They thrashed 
balors with ease.  The player (who is usually more tolerant of
one-spell-solutions than I am) recommended that we not allow this
in the future.

Mary Kuhner mkkuhner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]