<troll mode on>
If you consider game played with a buggy adjudicator being "no true
Diplomacy", then you should consider games played with the judges as
"no true Diplomacy".
<troll mode off>
I have not tested your Diplomacy/Facebook version, but think such
initiatives should be encouraged.
And actual players do not worry so much about how "correct" an
adjudicator is.
After a lot of thinking the question, the main incentive for players
is "I will prove I am a good players by beating players who are known
to be good".
Motives of site builder are "I have many players so my site is good,
my adjudicator is correct so I am competent". Motives of players are
"Let everyone know how good a player I am".
That was my two cents worth of psychanalysis.
Best.
On May 8, 8:29 am, Kestas Kuliukas <kes...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> Not sure if I understood you right here. If you're asking if phpDip is
> the only Diplomacy on Facebook then I think so, yes. But the adjudicator
> is still buggy on the Facebook version, so there's no true Diplomacy on
> Facebook yet, until 0.8 gets ****ted over.
|
