> Thanks to Lucas for his helpful DATC. By the way what do you do if
> certain tests are invalid? e.g. A test for what happens when an
> inspecific order is entered, when phpDip generates a list of orders
> to choose from.
The thing about the DATC is that they don't dictate the behavior of the
adjudicator as much as they give you a language to systematically
describe that behavior. In this case, you list the adjudicator as
compliant and cite that test in the errata as being invalid for the
adjudicator on the basis that the UI forces valid input.
> I posted this message a while back, but it got no response. This may
> be because no-one is interested (unlike the previous release), but it
> may also be that I posted via Google Groups, which I later found out
> that a lot of news servers ignore due to spam.
> If you're reading this for the second time I apologize
I got the first message. I don't know why I didn't reply. It must have
just gotten buried.
I'm a bit paranoid, so I'm only going to play on adjudicators where I
know the security policy of the admins - specifically the USAL, USAZ and
UKYS judges. When I started USAK, I did so because I didn't like to GM
games on some of the judge that had registrations on them grandfathered
from before version 1.5 of the nJudge code and USAL has a limit on the
number of games... and Todd Lawson was using most of that limit before
he started USAZ.
Chris
|
