Chris Babcock <cbabcock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>> I thought it looked very user friendly and readable, kudos!
>Thank you.
>> The only thing I thought you could add possibly was a bit of
>> "hierarchy" to some of the responses, e.g. if you're not getting
>> mail, your first step is how to assess if the Judge is working, then
>> if you find the Judge is working, then you look at your sent mail and
>> match the address, then you go to the openings list to see if that is
>> being updated, or something like that. But that would be tweaking
>> and might be hard to implement.
>I could have done it as a "how-to" instead of a FAQ, since the material
>is currently very linear in its presentation. Someone who is not
>receiving mail from the judge would do well to start at the beginning
>and work their way down in the order the material is presented.
>The FAQ doesn't address any other issue right now except that of a user
>not getting mail from the judge. There are two other complete sets of
>issues with email to the judge in multipart/alternative MIME and
>non-standard character sets. That could become dated very quickly if a
>server-side solution was devised that could be easily implemented on
>the variety of judge platforms.
>Chris
I understand, this is just a suggestion if you were to keep building it.
Jim-Bob
|
