> I thought it looked very user friendly and readable, kudos!
Thank you.
> The only thing I thought you could add possibly was a bit of
> "hierarchy" to some of the responses, e.g. if you're not getting
> mail, your first step is how to *****s if the Judge is working, then
> if you find the Judge is working, then you look at your sent mail and
> match the address, then you go to the openings list to see if that is
> being updated, or something like that. But that would be tweaking
> and might be hard to implement.
I could have done it as a "how-to" instead of a FAQ, since the material
is currently very linear in its presentation. Someone who is not
receiving mail from the judge would do well to start at the beginning
and work their way down in the order the material is presented.
The FAQ doesn't address any other issue right now except that of a user
not getting mail from the judge. There are two other complete sets of
issues with email to the judge in multipart/alternative MIME and
non-standard character sets. That could become dated very quickly if a
server-side solution was devised that could be easily implemented on
the variety of judge platforms.
Chris
|
