"David E. Cohen" <david_e_cohen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
I don't really consider it a hole in the rules, anything that the rules
don't specifically prohibit (again in my view) can be done. Therefore,
the prohibition against self-dislodgement is about sup****ts and moves, not
about convoys. In this sense, I agree with David. But just because the
two of us agree, that doesn't mean that others do not have the other view.
Jim-Bob
>It is a hole in the rules. One of well over a dozen.
>I have seen people come down on each side on this. My personal view is
that
>since the rules do not prohibit it (it is *not* an attack on or a sup****t
of
>an attack on one of your own units), it is possible for such a convoy to
>succeed.
>"anna" <mycocktaildress@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:ecfdf785-9ea3-4540-8695-189b2a56ae09@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> So you can't dislodge your own unit, nor can you sup****t a
>> dislodgement of your own unit, both clearly stated in the 4th edition
>> rules.
>>
>> But nowhere is it mentioned wether or not you can convey someone
>> else's army to an attack that dislodges your own army.
>>
>> Any ideas anyone?
>>
>> cheers
|
