> Misunderstanding would be
> understandable and it may not be a distinction worth making, but if it
> reflects different history source information than I cited above, I'd
> love to read it. (If it's personal memories of you or someone you know,
> I want to conduct an electronic interview.)
I played diplomacy using the judges 10 years ago, when I was 14, at
which time it didn't occur to me there could be a distinction. So yes,
they are personal memories. I will adapt the About page with your
input, which is greatly appreciated.
>
> What's the state of adjudicator testing? Have you been using the
> DATC test cases (http://web.inter.nl.net/users/L.B.Kruijswijk/)?No
> fault if you haven't, but it might be helpful if you wish a systematic
> rather than (or in addition to) a stress testing approach.
I wasn't aware of these test cases, but I will certainly take a look
at this with the judge programmer (I have to be honest, I didn't do it
myself).
> but it is surprising to get kicked out to
> a start page when you are expecting the registration page.
The gateway page was being used as a teaser at first, but we are
probably going to keep it. So you are right: we will need to change
the links to the login and registration page :-)
Thanks for your comments! I will send you an e-mail with my contact
details (the one I posted this with is invalid now).
Jan
|
