Del Dingle <dcdingle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>On the Suzuki board I frequent, you risk immediate flames for asking
>"Which engine oil is best for my bike?" without searching the numerous
>previous postings on the same subject. I'm going to risk that here
>because I'd like to see some traffic... and I'm lazy.
As I said before, somebody MIGHT say it has been discussed before, but you
wouldn't get flames, I don't think. And besides, the answer to this
question is context specific so that the answer today might differ from
the answer in the future or in the past. In fact, I'm sure it does.
>Why do you prefer the judge/site on which you primarily play? (Yes,
>yes, ignoring Face-to-Face games.)
I've pretty much stopped playing judge games, and play only with Human GMs
these days, I really have always preferred human GMs (even if I'm the only
one I know who actually adjudicates by hand without a map). So that's
probably the #1 issue for me.
>I haven't joined a game on the DPJudge yet because I wanted to get back
>into some games quickly after a long sabbatical and was already familiar
>with the Ken Lowe judges. Likewise with some of the other modern
>interfaces, like BOUNCED. (and others at
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Diplomacy)
>For me, the Lowe judges allow me to send orders/communications from
>work. Uh, you know.... during approved breaks. Some of the other
>sites, including floc.net, unfortunately, are blocked as gaming by the
>the cor****ate masters. I know some people aren't fond of the
>Lowe/NJudge syntax, but if you look at it as sending coded messages, it
>lends an air of intrigue, especially when co-workers are looking over
>your shoulder.
>-Del
You can also do that with Human GM's and E-Mails though you're using less
coded message syntax.
Jim-Bob
|
