Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Core War > Re: Working Slo...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 5 Topic 2227 of 2343
Post > Topic >>

Re: Working SlowQscan

by pauldkline@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mar 5, 2008 at 11:42 AM

On Mar 5, 10:17=A0am, Roy <roy.van.r...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> It scored somewhat better in my tests at least :-)

Well, that's what we want :-)

Looks like bombing with dat 0,0 can cause an early exit, that is
something I didn't notice, possibly because there aren't many a-values
of 2 in my cadre of test q4's.  There are some 1's which is probably
why { worked better than *, something that was counter-intuitive
anyway.

P. Kline
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
Working SlowQscan
pauldkline@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-03-04 15:11:09 
Re: Working SlowQscan
Roy <roy.van.rijn@[EMA  2008-03-05 01:04:03 
Re: Working SlowQscan
pauldkline@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-03-05 05:55:01 
Re: Working SlowQscan
Roy <roy.van.rijn@[EMA  2008-03-05 08:17:09 
Re: Working SlowQscan
pauldkline@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-03-05 11:42:25 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 13:31:19 CDT 2008.