Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Chess debate > Goichberg's "Ne...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 14 Topic 10018 of 10358
Post > Topic >>

Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF

by samsloan <samhsloan@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 05:35 PM

Bill Goichberg has been circulating a "new plan". Essentially, his new
plan calls for a reinstatement of the "no magazine member****p".

Regular dues for those who want the magazine will be $42. Those who do
not want the magazine will only have to pay $29.

In the fiscal year ending May 30, 2008, three weeks from today, the
USCF will have lost $300,000.

Bill Goichberg seems to think that this change will stop the horrific
losses the USCF has suffered every year EXCEPT FOR THE ONE YEAR THAT I
WAS ON THE BOARD.

However, Goichberg is ignoring the fact that during the one year that
I was on the board member****p increased and the year ended with a
small surplus.

Bill Goichberg is claiming that it is because of the "Internet" that
the USCF lost money this year.

We had the Internet last year too.

Bill Goichberg is losing money this year because of mismanagement.
That is the reason, pure and simple.

Of course, my posting about this over on the USCF Issues Forum will
probably be pulled as a violation of the AUG, but at least it can not
be said that I did not try to tell the members.

Bill Goichberg needs to resign. However, Goichberg is playing the
Truong card well. By now, everybody knows that Goichberg is not the
right man for the job, but we also know that Truong is an outright
crook and a thief. Nobody wants to try to force Goichberg out knowing
that he might be replaced by Truong.

Sam Sloan
 




 14 Posts in Topic:
Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
samsloan <samhsloan@[E  2008-05-08 17:35:42 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-08 17:59:37 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
jkh001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 04:37:53 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
Rich Hutnik <richardhu  2008-05-12 19:22:00 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
jkh001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 20:03:45 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-12 21:00:06 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
jkh001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 22:46:18 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
Rich Hutnik <richardhu  2008-05-13 07:52:06 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
Rich Hutnik <richardhu  2008-05-13 07:54:26 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
samsloan <samhsloan@[E  2008-05-15 01:39:52 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
samsloan <samhsloan@[E  2008-05-15 07:44:10 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
samsloan <samhsloan@[E  2008-05-15 13:53:31 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
samsloan <samhsloan@[E  2008-05-16 03:34:14 
Re: Goichberg's "New Plan" for the USCF
samsloan <samhsloan@[E  2008-05-16 08:46:03 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 13:03:00 CDT 2008.