The following appears on the Trolgar controlled forum chessdiscussion:
by Harry Payne on Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:25 pm
gregory wrote:It should be noted that Mr. Sloan and Brian Lafferty
has had sanction after sanction overturned by Bill Goichberg and the FOC
over the course of a year now. When I was on the FOC and moderation
committees I personally witnessed similiar behavior to be tacitly
encouraged as long as it can lead to the embarrassment of Goichberg’s
political opponents.
Here is a post from Harry Payne who is an official member of the
USCF forum oversight committee: “you are correct, I believe Mr. Truong
needs to be gone at any and/or all cost.” Apr 21, 2008 4:54 pm #99253
This type of attitude to aggressively persue any methods possible
to investigate, smear, and harass someone’s family in order to try to
remove a candidate of the board is shameful at best. Unfortunately,
there is a very small group of dedicated people that will use any means
to meet these ends.
Paul and Susan, I am really sorry that you, or anyone for that
matter, has to go thru with this.
Gregory
Gregory,
I most certainly believe Paul needs to be removed from the Executive
Board, of the USCF. I do take personal offense at linking me to this
thread. I have never raised the issue of Susan's children. I have stated
(which you neglect to post here) If any member of the USCF or of the
USCF EB, has threaten Susan's Children they need to show the proof and
have them put in jail. There is not now, nor is there ever a need to
drag children into the mess going on. The "context" of the post, you
pulled my "text" from, was Paul's removal by recall petition, or A
Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Hillary stated he disagreed with a Judge, and
stated I wanted to see Paul removed at any cost. Which I agreed with.
But certainly not at the cost of harassment of Susan's Children. I do
not know if Susan's Children have been harassed or not. What Sam, posted
on the other site I have not read because I do not go there. And he has
not posted it on the USCF Forum because it would have been pulled.(
Which I think, if I remember correctly some time back he attempted to
do, and it was pulled. What you wish to say, or what you think of me,
matters little to me. But I would appreciate, you keep it in context,
and keep it honest. If this gets posted I will be pleasantly surprised,
but noting from the past, I doubt it. I know of no one on the EB, or in
the USCF, that condones Sam's post. Also, as a member of the MOC, I do
not have the power to overturn a sanction, that is by appeal to the FOC.
I have absolutely no knowledge what-so-ever of Mr. Goichberg even being
in touch with members of the FOC. Fact of business I do know for a fact
one member of the FOC, would make such an attempt public, as he is an
honest man of good character. (I believe any of the FOC members would
actually).
Also, I am not a member of the FOC, I am a member of the MOC (Moderation
oversight Committee).
Thank you
Harry Payne.
--------------------------------------------------------
by gregory on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:58 pm
Harry,
You are extremely vociferous in your opposition to Paul, and you have
actively sought and sup****t different routes to 'get rid of him', even
if it means finding an attorney to find any loop-hole, and if that does
not work; to eliminate existing USCF election bylaws.
My point was not to link you to Brian Lafferty's latest episodes, but
point out that there are quite a few people that will 'use any means' to
accomplish their goals. Many of you have gone too far and the extreme
tactics needs to stop.
Just my civil take,
G
Gregory
ChessDiscussion webmaster
----------------------------------------------------------
I would remind Gregory, the Trolgar Minion, that it was Trolgar who
injected her children into USCF affairs with the bald assertion that
they had been threatened. As I recall, Mr. Truong raised the issue by
asking me on the USCF Issues Forum if I was the one who anonymously
threatened Ms. Polgar's children. I of course did not and recommended
that he and Ms. Polgar re****t the matter to the FBI at Federal Plaza in
Manhattan and that they contact the Queens County District Attorney. I
even offered to put them in touch with an old law school classmate who
works in that office. There was no response from Trolgar to my offer
and Trolgar has NEVER confirmed publicly that they filed a complaint
anywhere. Mr. Truong then raised the issue of Ms. Polgar's children yet
again by writing a letter to the FOC strongly implying that I had
threatened Ms. Polgar's children and that I was "a dangerous person."
For Trolgar to complain that the issue of a court order controlling
their behavior regarding her children is not a valid issue is ludicrous.
She injected her children into USCF affairs with as yet
unsubstantiated claims of threats against them. Her conduct and that of
her now acknowledged husband toward children, especially her own, is
relevant, IMO, to her fitness to be involved in scholastic chess.
Gregory has, over the past several months, been clearly shown to be
nothing more than Trolgar's ****ll despite he attempts to appear otherwise.
|
