Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Chess debate > How the CIA tre...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 9984 of 10365
Post > Topic >>

How the CIA treats dissenters - political ASLYUM

by marcuswroberts@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 28, 2008 at 11:38 AM

My guess is that they like to meet Monday morning and talk about me.
Here is how the CIA tried to treat
Marcus Roberts. The issue isn't an Ambassador****p. The issue is that I
am not an America. I am a dual
national.

Marcus Roberts
Ambassador of St Kitts and Nevis, at Large

Nicaraguan Contras' Narcotics Trafficking Website

Press Release Regarding Anita Belle's Exile & Unjust Disbarment



Home | Why You Shouldn't Wait Any Longer to Give Reparations |
Pictures of Sabotage Victims of the CIA Cases. | Press Release
Regarding Anita Belle's Exile & Unjust Disbarment | Spiritual Warfare
| Black Israelites Organization, Inc. | Download the Reparations Case
| 4 Part Series About the Reparations Cases | Contact Info




U.S. Supreme Court to rule on Belle's petition for rehearing on or
around February 20, 2004.  Will the Justices disclose their Masonic
affiliations?



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Anita E. Belle, J.D.


Current Contact Phone: (888) 234-9596

January 23, 2004

U.S. SUPREME COURT RUBBER-STAMPS FLORIDA DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS:
MODERN-DAY COINTELPRO FORCES WHISTLE-BLOWER INTO EXILE.

A Florida attorney suing the federal government alleged that seven car
accidents occurring on or around her court deadlines were deliberately
staged counter-intelligence program (COINTELPRO) murder attempts.
When the U.S. Supreme Court upheld federal appellate rulings that the
alleged COINTELPRO was frivolous, the attorney sought political asylum
in Canada.  Then, despite undisputed evidence of being disbarred from
practicing law without due process, the high court upheld the Florida
Supreme Courts ruling that disbarred the whistle-blowing attorney.


COINTELPRO was a FBI program begun by its former and long-time
director, J. Edgar Hoover, in 1956 to neutralize American political
dissidents.  The program officially ended in 1971 to afford additional
security to our [its] sensitive techniques and operations of
disrupting racially-related activities in the name of internal/
national security.


Anita E. Belle, a black female practicing law in Florida, alleged that
COINTELPRO reared its ugly head against her after she filed cases on
behalf of blacks and whites in seven states harmed due to the Central
Intelligence Agency or CIAs role in im****ting illegal drugs into black
communities.  She alleged that at least one reputed CIA agent admitted
the agency conspired with organized crime to use illegal drugs as a
means of pharmaceutically enslaving African-Americans.  In early 2000,
five of her seven cases were consolidated as the Nicaraguan Contras
Narcotics Trafficking Litigation, MDL 1331, in the federal court in
Gainesville, Florida.


Belle claims that the cases became so sabotaged that she and her
family were forced to flee Florida in fear of their lives.  She first
moved to North Carolina, but left there after witnesses in the CIA
cases were threatened.  She then returned to her hometown of Detroit,
Michigan.


Belle recalled the Iran-Contra scandal that plagued the presidencies
of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.  During the 2000 Florida
election debacle, Belle made a Freedom of Information (FOIA) request
to the FBI for the criminal records of the former president and his
sons, Florida governor Jeb Bush and presidential candidate/Texas
governor George W. Bush.  The FBI denied her FOIA request on privacy
grounds.  Belle then sued the FBI, arguing that the federal criminal
records of public officials should not be protected by privacy, else
Americans may unwittingly elect organized crimelords who will
undermine the integrity of the government.  Meanwhile, Belle claims
the retaliation against her and her family continued in Detroit to
such an extent that she added COINTELPRO allegations to her case
against the FBI.


Belle alleged the Florida Bar was a co-conspirator with the FBI in the
agencys COINTELPRO activities, accusing the Florida Bar of disbarring
her so as to discredit her and halt her suits against the federal
government.  She alleged that the Florida Bars investigator on her
disbarment case, Bill Freeh, was a retired FBI agent and a close
relative of Louis Freeh, the director of the FBI at that time.

Belle further alleged that both George Bushes were members of Masonic
fraternities that vow to keep and cover up their brothers secrets.
She accused that when politicians, law enforcement, lawyers,
physicians, and the judiciary are also freemasons, then organized
crimelords could racketeer the Masonic vow to avoid prosecution and
punishment for their crimes.  She cited that the United Kingdom had
recognized this above the law danger and required judges to disclose
their Masonic affiliations.  Belle thus requested that the judges on
her cases make disclosure similar to that being done by British
judges, a motion that was denied.  Belle argued that Masonic
disclosure was of heightened im****tance in southern states such as
Florida where white masons founded the Ku Klux Klan.



She later discovered that Robert Cleland, the Michigan federal judge
who dismissed her FBI case as frivolous, was a white freemason.  She
also discovered that Florida Supreme Court Justice Leander Shaw, who
concurred in her disbarment, was a black mason.  Belle had also filed
a reparations case that was dismissed as frivolous by a Maryland
federal judge, Alexander Williams, who was also a Prince Hall mason.
Belle accuses the judges of harboring secret bias and discriminating
against her, a non-mason, in favor of fellow masons.

Belle appealed the FBI case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court,
Belle & Belle v. FBI et al, U.S. Supreme Court docket number 02-9357.
Both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
ignored Belles hundreds of pages of evidence of sabotage and judicial
bias to cover up biased Judge Clelands ruling of frivolousness.  The
effect of the U.S. Supreme Courts ruling gives COINTELPRO permission
to continue attempts to assassinate Belle, a non-violent political
dissenter.  Belle was therefore forced to cross the border between
Detroit and Windsor, Ontario to seek Canadian refugee protection from
the U.S.

The Supreme Courts ruling in Belles FBI case also means that the
federal criminal records of public officials may be protected by
privacy.  This means that voters are denied freedom to information
that could prevent drug-trafficking, organized crimelords from
corrupting federal and state governments.

In her disbarment case, Belle v. Florida Bar, U.S. Supreme Court
docket number 03-6857, Belle presented evidence that the Florida Bar
denied her due process by sending notices of proceedings to obsolete
addresses even though they knew of her Michigan address.  She
presented evidence that, contrary to its own internal operating
procedures, the U.S. Post Office did not forward her mail.  As a
result of the lack of notice, most of her disbarment proceedings
occurred in secret until it was almost too late for her to appeal.
She presented evidence of collusion between the Michigan case against
the FBI and the Florida disbarment, evidence of judicial bias of
Masonic judges, and evidence of at least one lost court order, lost
motions, docket errors, double jeopardy, and falsification of court
do***ents.  Despite these due process violations, the U.S. Supreme
Court upheld the Florida Supreme Courts ruling of disbarment.  The
case is still pending, awaiting the high courts ruling on Belles
petition for rehearing that seeks disclosure of the Supreme Court
justices Masonic affiliation or other grounds for bias.


For more information, contact Anita E. Belle at (416) 464-2461 or
email irlfcanada@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 your two cents on our message board.  Click below.  (Remember to
keep it clean.)


Take the Poll
Do you think judges should disclose their Masonic affiliation?
Yes
No


View Stats


 Bravenet












This page last updated on July 12, 2004.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
How the CIA treats dissenters - political ASLYUM
marcuswroberts@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-28 11:38:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 15:16:48 CDT 2008.