Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Computer Chess miscellaneous topics > Re: Strongest?
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 102 Topic 14304 of 14706
Post > Topic >>

Re: Strongest?

by ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 15, 2008 at 10:43 AM

On May 15, 10:17=A0am, ttk5...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 15, 8:06=A0am, "Chess One" <OneCh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > <jkh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >news:a81371eb-4be0-4468-9dcd-affd23852beb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Alekhine's Parrot" (that quacking fowl Phil Innes) writes at the
> > _Chessville Weekly_:
>
> > "Coming up later this Year =96 Strongest ever US Tournament.
>
> > "September 19th to 28th sees a [so far] Category 15 tournament on US
> > soil in the 10 player SPICE CUP. =A0Seven of the 10 invitees have
> > already signed up, and I understand average Elo is currently 2600."
>
> > Question: Is it really plausible to claim that this tournament is/will
> > be stronger than New York 1927, or the 1st and 2nd Piatigorsky Cups?
> > ("Highest category" would be correct, but that's not what he wrote.)
>
> > ---
>
> > =A0 =A0 Im****tant News!
>
> > John Hillery thinks that any group of 10 US Players circa 1927
//average=
d//
> > 2600 ratings. =A0 :)))))))
>
> =A0 That is not what he is saying, Phil. By "US tournament," he clearly
> means "a chess tournament played on US soil," and not "a tournament
> limited to US citizens." The three events he refers to: New York 1927,
> and the two Piatigorsky Cups (Los Angeles 1963 and Santa Monica 1966),
> had only one or two American players each, out of six to 10 total
> contestants.
>
> > [quite apart from the fact that no ratings existed, even as
retrofitted
> > numbers against other players in the world, that is some might claim!]
>
> > Sometimes I don't know where his talents begin - somewhere on the
Yellow=

> > Brick Road? Anyway, now we know what the JKH definition of 'plausible'
i=
s.
> > It is indeed possible that he thinks 1927 players could average 2600,
an=
d
> > that is enough to write into these newsgroups, with disparaging
comments=

> > like a newbie or a follower of clan-Murray.
>
> > As a journalist, surely John Hillery will want to substatiate his
point =
by
> > mentioning even one fact; for example, a list of 10 players he
proposes =
to
> > average 2600 from 1927, would seem to me to be a minimum proposition
on =
his
> > part in order to be plausible.
>
> =A0 Here are the contestants at New York 1927, with their 5-year peak
> ratings as given by Dr. Elo in his book:
>
> Capablanca: =A02725
> Alekhine: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02690
> Nimzovitch: =A0 =A02615
> Vidmar: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02600
> Spielmann: =A0 =A02560
> Marshall: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02570
>
> =A0 That's an average of 2627, which would ****ge it just into Category
> 16 (Elo 2626-2650). Probably a pretty reasonable estimate, perhaps a
> mite high -- with the exception of the oldest player, Marshall, these
> masters were all at or near their time of peak performance. So it's
> quite plausible to suggest that New York 1927 might be the strongest
> tournament ever held on US soil. It certainly was the the strongest up
> to that time.
> =A0 Checking the list of "the world's strongest tournaments" in Fox &
> James' "The Even More Complete Chess Addict" (Faber and Faber, 1993),
> we do indeed find NY 1927, and the two Piatigorsky Cups, given as the
> strongest American events, all at an estimated Category 15
> (2601-2625).
>
> =A0 If this Spice Cup tournament surp***** them, it will be quite a
> prestigious event.

  Just for the sake of fuller information, here are the Patigorsky Cup
contestants, and their 5-year peak Elo ratings (or Jan 1978 rating
where Elo does not give a 5-year peak):

1963:

Keres           2670
Petrosian     2680
Najdorf         2635
Olafsson      2530 (as of 1/1/1978)
Reshevsky   2680
Gligoric         2620
Benko           2570
Panno           2580 (1/1/1978)

1966:

Spassky        2680
Fischer          2780 (1/11978)
Larsen           2620 (1/1/1978)
****tisch         2630 (1/1/1978)
Unzicker        2590
Petrosian       2680
Reshevsky     2680
Najdorf           2635
Ivkov               2570
Donner           2500
 




 102 Posts in Topic:
Strongest?
jkh001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 15:54:34 
Re: Strongest?
Mike Murray <mikemurra  2008-05-12 16:37:00 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-15 08:06:06 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-15 07:17:41 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-15 17:46:37 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-15 10:43:53 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-15 19:07:11 
Re: Strongest?
"Wlodzimierz Holszty  2008-05-15 15:40:15 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-15 18:54:55 
Re: Strongest?
jkh001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 16:58:14 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-20 09:20:18 
Re: Strongest?
nobody <master@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 12:01:49 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-21 09:22:27 
Re: Strongest?
David Richerby <davidr  2008-05-21 12:49:05 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-21 17:24:18 
Re: Strongest?
David Richerby <davidr  2008-05-22 13:40:17 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-25 08:10:28 
Re: Strongest?
David Richerby <davidr  2008-05-21 13:38:08 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-16 06:50:05 
Re: Strongest?
David Richerby <davidr  2008-05-21 12:22:18 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-16 08:18:27 
Re: Strongest?
zdrakec <zdrakec@[EMAI  2008-05-16 08:23:23 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-16 21:08:48 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-20 09:29:40 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-19 00:38:55 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-19 00:55:26 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-19 06:31:26 
Re: Strongest?
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-19 07:43:12 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-19 12:58:21 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-19 13:02:18 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-19 14:57:20 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-19 15:38:33 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-19 15:43:30 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-19 18:53:53 
Re: Strongest?
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-20 00:10:06 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 06:44:12 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-20 07:57:14 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-20 08:00:14 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-20 13:56:59 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 11:22:07 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-20 12:46:27 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-20 12:55:38 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-20 18:17:32 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-20 17:45:09 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-21 09:10:36 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-20 20:04:27 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-21 17:11:43 
Re: Strongest?
nobody <master@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 18:57:05 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-21 17:19:20 
Re: Strongest?
nobody <master@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:29:24 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-21 03:39:42 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-21 05:26:36 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 06:07:09 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-21 17:35:50 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-22 06:33:21 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-21 07:30:36 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-21 17:38:57 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 14:47:35 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-25 08:00:13 
Re: Strongest?
jkh001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-21 15:22:00 
Re: Strongest?
SBD <DrDowd@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-21 16:56:15 
Re: Strongest?
David Richerby <davidr  2008-05-22 14:17:13 
Phil Innes and the Komodo Dragon (was: Strongest?)
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 17:13:23 
Re: Phil Innes and the Komodo Dragon (was: Strongest?)
"Chess One" <  2008-05-23 07:09:06 
Re: Phil Innes and the Komodo Dragon (was: Strongest?)
"Chess One" <  2008-05-23 07:24:49 
Re: Strongest?
nobody <master@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:39:36 
Re: Strongest?
nobody <master@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 12:07:49 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-21 20:26:00 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-21 20:28:42 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-21 20:30:34 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-25 08:04:09 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-21 20:33:46 
Re: Strongest?
jkh001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-22 01:28:41 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-22 05:20:28 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-22 05:24:50 
Re: Strongest?
Mike Murray <mikemurra  2008-05-22 06:28:33 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-22 14:34:24 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-22 14:36:52 
Re: Strongest?
jkh001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-22 14:59:30 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-25 09:39:53 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-22 16:22:57 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-22 18:19:29 
Re: Strongest?
jkh001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-22 20:37:59 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-22 21:29:05 
Re: Strongest?
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-22 23:09:11 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-23 00:43:26 
Re: Phil Innes and the Komodo Dragon (was: Strongest?)
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-23 17:05:42 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-25 07:41:24 
Re: Strongest?
"Chess One" <  2008-05-28 09:25:13 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-25 08:01:38 
Re: Strongest?
"Wlodzimierz Holszty  2008-05-25 11:40:23 
Re: Strongest?
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-26 23:00:39 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-27 02:18:08 
Re: Strongest?
Mike Murray <mikemurra  2008-05-27 06:31:53 
Re: Strongest?
"Wlodzimierz Holszty  2008-05-27 04:25:47 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-27 20:50:45 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-27 21:05:52 
Re: Strongest?
Mike Murray <mikemurra  2008-05-28 10:06:10 
Re: Strongest?
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-28 07:38:20 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-28 20:30:28 
Re: Strongest?
David Richerby <davidr  2008-05-29 11:43:35 
Re: Strongest?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-29 16:44:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 3:59:47 CDT 2008.