Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Computer Chess miscellaneous topics > Re: New In Ches...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 34 of 44 Topic 14290 of 14709
Post > Topic >>

Re: New In Chess #3 2008

by "David Kane" <davidekane@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 14, 2008 at 01:49 AM

"Mike Murray" <mikemurray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:sccj24di06l0o491gm113pjv7cnci60c5u@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 05:57:05 -0700 (PDT), "parrthenon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
> <parrthenon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>>Canadian chess journalist Jonathan Berry observed, "It has been
>>re****ted that President Clinton in his memoirs said the embargo was
>>ignored by all, even the USA government, and it was only enforced to
>>the extent that arms were not sent to Serbia. Yet arms were sent with
>>impunity to other factions, and other contacts with Serbia were okay.
>>If true, the whole incident appears doubly pointless."
>
>>A reader replied, "It's even worse than that. Serbia allegedly
>>received missiles produced in the USA via Israel which makes it
>>grotesquely hypocritical to punish Fischer for his 30 games against
>>Spassky."
>
> While the blade hovered menacingly over Fischer's head for many years,
> AFAIK, the only overt action against him was taken by the Shrub
> administration, and then only by the back door of a pass****t
> violation,  using the Japanese as surrogates.  It  was a sneaky,
> vindictive action which appears to have deliberately evaded addressing
> the issues Berry mentions in your quote, above.

Both you and Berry miss several im****ant facts. First, Fischer was
indicted immediately after completing the match. Whether the embargo
*ultimately* proved effective was really irrelevant. (By the way, I would
not make an *****sment based on some offhand comments interpreted
by a Canadian chess journalist!) Second, Fischer
did not set foot in the US while under indictment- what overt actions
*could* the US reasonably have taken? Third, Fischer no doubt
called attention to himself with his pro-9/11 radio broadcast. That likely
increased interest in bringing him to justice, but the US still
could not seek extradition because his crime was not listed in
the extradition treaty. Fischer's expired pass****t gave the US other
avenues to explore. The US explored them but alternate legal
approaches were unsuccessful.

Once you dismiss the "chessplayers are above the law"
arguments, I really don't see any wrongdoing on the part
of the US government.
 




 44 Posts in Topic:
New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-10 13:08:05 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
Old Haasie <RSHaas@[EM  2008-05-10 16:17:30 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
samsloan <samhsloan@[E  2008-05-10 16:28:24 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-10 17:51:55 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
The Historian <neil.th  2008-05-10 20:12:12 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
samsloan <samhsloan@[E  2008-05-11 00:42:14 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-11 05:34:39 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
billbrock1958@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-13 09:39:06 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_R  2008-05-14 13:24:36 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-13 09:51:58 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
everincon@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-14 01:11:57 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-13 20:25:45 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"David Kane" &l  2008-05-14 00:56:54 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
Louis Blair <lblai@[EM  2008-05-13 20:54:40 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
nobody <master@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 11:13:30 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-11 22:00:24 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_R  2008-05-12 10:24:31 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_R  2008-05-12 11:44:59 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"David Kane" &l  2008-05-12 13:00:51 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 07:12:03 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_R  2008-05-12 17:36:54 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"David Kane" &l  2008-05-12 21:09:18 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_R  2008-05-13 10:27:41 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
Louis Blair <lblai@[EM  2008-05-12 14:49:24 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_R  2008-05-12 23:58:06 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 21:59:38 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_R  2008-05-13 09:58:16 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-14 18:21:56 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"David Kane" &l  2008-05-15 09:28:22 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
ttk5079@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 05:35:45 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-13 05:57:05 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
Mike Murray <mikemurra  2008-05-13 08:25:36 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_R  2008-05-13 17:48:19 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"David Kane" &l  2008-05-14 01:49:52 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
Mike Murray <mikemurra  2008-05-14 08:49:33 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"David Kane" &l  2008-05-14 09:58:50 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
Mike Murray <mikemurra  2008-05-14 10:18:17 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"David Kane" &l  2008-05-14 13:57:29 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-13 07:09:03 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"David Kane" &l  2008-05-13 09:08:04 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-13 12:25:36 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"David Kane" &l  2008-05-13 18:41:37 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"parrthenon@[EMAIL P  2008-05-14 05:17:21 
Re: New In Chess #3 2008
"David Kane" &l  2008-05-14 14:16:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 10:50:01 CDT 2008.