On May 12, 11:03 pm, jkh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Rich Hutnik wrote:
> > On May 8, 8:35 pm, samsloan <samhsl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Bill Goichberg has been circulating a "new plan". Essentially, his
new
> > > plan calls for a reinstatement of the "no magazine member****p".
>
> > > Regular dues for those who want the magazine will be $42. Those who
do
> > > not want the magazine will only have to pay $29.
>
> > So, the magazine doesn't have enough of a circulation in order to be
> > able to have the advertising pay for its circulation? If it were done
> > right, with a large enough subscriber base, the magazine could be
> > free.
>
> > Oh well. Good luck on the USCF getting this going.
>
> > - Rich
>
> Really? And how many free magazines do you know of? Since all you need
> is "a large enough subscriber base," where go I go to get my free
> copies to /Time/, /Newsweek/ and /People/?
Consider the likes of trade publications I get. I have multiple
subscriptions in the area of sales and so on, which are free to me.
Advertising is supposed to pay for all, if not most, of the publi****ng
costs. Money paid for the publication is supposed to be profit. And
people pay for Time, Newsweek, etc... because the publisher can charge
for it.
- Rich
|
