Re: The Euphemism in Botvinnik

On May 6, 3:37=A0pm, help bot <nomorech...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 6, 11:10 am, ttk5...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> > =A0 Even allowing, for the sake of argument, Bronstein's
interpretation
> > of 1948-51, I don't see anything unethical in this. However, what the
> > Spanish writers seem to be implying, or believe that Bronstein is
> > implying, is that Botvinnik used his position and connections to gain
> > preferential access to others' games
>
> =A0 This "interpretation" escapes me; I cannot read
> Spanish,

  Then you might be well advised to avoid commenting from ignorance.
Not that that has deterred you in the past.

> =A0 This "question" would seem to apply to *all* of
> the Russian world champions; why then is Mr.
> Botvinnik being singled out here?

  It's quite simple. The link given in the original post deals with
Botvinnik, therefore my comments deal with Botvinnik.