Chess One wrote:
> "Brian Lafferty" <blafferty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:1ZHSj.6$JF1.5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I hope this is more to your liking. It was probably too erudite for
Phil.
>> :-)
>
> Let's face it BRAIN, you were not hiding your lights under a cloak of
> erudition, you were whining about other people as usual, and cannot seem
to
> do otherwise, no matter what the topic is.
>
> When asked the simplest thing about yourself and what was journalism was
to
> your mind, you decided you couldn't understand English.
>
>
> :)
>
>
> While saying nothing of substance to any topic you have become rightly
> famous for vacuity, so that here on usenet is the only place you may
utter
> your sweet nothings.
>
> While you amuse yourself and certain other misanthropic speculators by
> spewing forth such nihilistic tripe, you merely succeed in identifying
your
> own melancholic condition, and those who are like you. From this
platform
> you then pronounce upon other people, as if you were not the same
species as
> those commented upon.
>
> [[[Should you like to know the clinical name of your condition?
> [Write publicly or in priviate.] I no longer do a lot of free
consulting,
> but there is no shame in a conversation, no?]]]
>
> There are several ideas around this condition I diagnose in you, at home
and
> abroad there is very great consensus among psychologists that such
behavior
> as your own can fairly be described as being nutz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Though some people prefer net-nutz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
since the phenomena only works when
one
> cloaks oneself in anonym, much like an alien cannog admit any human
> condition, in fact, who does not understand how earth-people are, nor
can
> say how they themselves are.
>
> We have departed from any nominal thread topic to the only one you care
for,
> and while this is itself a pathology,
>
> <right?>
>
> even people who don't like me are wondering about the BRIAN's
orientation
> and reason for writing anything at all.
>
> You may, by all means, respond in your usual like, which is to
> enthusiasticly volunteer referernces to other men's bottoms, and this in
> itself is no /necessary/ good-old-American homo***ual repressed
approach,
> though... there is very great consensus among psychologists ...
>
>
> Cordially, Phil Innes
>
> The Hippocampus,
> Vermont
Interesting psychological projection from BB. Funny also. :-)
|
