"Brian Lafferty" <blafferty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1ZHSj.6$JF1.5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I hope this is more to your liking. It was probably too erudite for
Phil.
>:-)
Let's face it BRAIN, you were not hiding your lights under a cloak of
erudition, you were whining about other people as usual, and cannot seem
to
do otherwise, no matter what the topic is.
When asked the simplest thing about yourself and what was journalism was
to
your mind, you decided you couldn't understand English.
:)
While saying nothing of substance to any topic you have become rightly
famous for vacuity, so that here on usenet is the only place you may utter
your sweet nothings.
While you amuse yourself and certain other misanthropic speculators by
spewing forth such nihilistic tripe, you merely succeed in identifying
your
own melancholic condition, and those who are like you. From this platform
you then pronounce upon other people, as if you were not the same species
as
those commented upon.
[[[Should you like to know the clinical name of your condition?
[Write publicly or in priviate.] I no longer do a lot of free consulting,
but there is no shame in a conversation, no?]]]
There are several ideas around this condition I diagnose in you, at home
and
abroad there is very great consensus among psychologists that such
behavior
as your own can fairly be described as being nutz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
some people prefer net-nutz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
since the phenomena only works when
one
cloaks oneself in anonym, much like an alien cannog admit any human
condition, in fact, who does not understand how earth-people are, nor can
say how they themselves are.
We have departed from any nominal thread topic to the only one you care
for,
and while this is itself a pathology,
<right?>
even people who don't like me are wondering about the BRIAN's orientation
and reason for writing anything at all.
You may, by all means, respond in your usual like, which is to
enthusiasticly volunteer referernces to other men's bottoms, and this in
itself is no /necessary/ good-old-American homo***ual repressed approach,
though... there is very great consensus among psychologists ...
Cordially, Phil Innes
The Hippocampus,
Vermont
> David Richerby wrote:
>> Brian Lafferty <blafferty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> [105 lines of quoted text]
>>> [36 blank lines]
>>> :-)
>>
>> Thank you for that staggeringly erudite contribution. Next time,
>> would you care to trim the quoted text and leave out the huge blanks
>> so that we might more easily find your `writing'?
>>
>>
>> Dave.
>>
|
