On Apr 30, 8:38 am, samsloan <samhsl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Do you feel that by posting thousands of obscene and ****ographic
> messages from "The Fake Sam Sloan"
Formerly, Mr. Sloan "identified" Paul Truong as
the offender; now it seems he has changed his
mind on a whim.
> and by posting similar obscene
> messages on her own blog athttp://www.susanpolgar.blogspot.com,
> Susan Polgar has been "eliminating gender-bias from the inside". Do
> you feel that her personal attacks on rival female chess grandmasters
> has helped by "actually encouraging self esteem in young women"?
Mr. Sloan got something right: Susan Polgar
has a long history of attacking her rivals. I got
the impression that she's stuck on herself.
> If you have such strong opinions on this subject, why do not you
> actually come up with some money and join the USCF? Why is it that her
> biggest sup****ters and our biggest critics are non-members such as
> Phil Innes, Rob Mitchell and Taylor Kingston? If you are so interested
> in the welfare of the USCF (instead of trying to destroy it which is
> what you seem to be trying to do) why not join our organization?
Let me take a stab at answering this one: those
guys may not like the way the USCF publishes
"ridiculously deflated numbers" as if they were
supposed to reflect their real, peak strengths at
chess. For instance, they have Dr. IMnes down
as a mere Expert; and Taylor Kingston as what,
a Class A or B player? Worst of all, they don't
even have any rating at all for Rob "da robber"
Mitchell! Now, what sort of organization is it
that conspires to artificially skew the ratings of
such greats? If you really want them to join,
first you're gonna hafta "fix" that broken rating
system.
-- help bot
|
