On Apr 30, 11:17=A0am, The Historian <neil.thehistor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
> I don't see anything "nice" about ill-informed historical writing.
> Yes, it it's a minor thing, but it implies the rest of your research
> is of a like nature.
>
> BTW, I'm a heck of a lot nicer than Edward Winter would be.- Hide quoted
t=
ext -
>
Look, I am fairly new to this and I don't claim to be this great chess
historian. This is purely a small hobby for me. My intent is not to
spew "ill-informed" facts. I've seen your credentials on your blog
and I am not even in the same league with you with respect to chess
history.
If you feel I can improve on various things that I post, then I am
happy to hear criticism from someone as well informed as you. I just
don't think you need to attack me in the manner that you have chosen.
I'm really not a bad guy, just a novice.
|
