On Apr 30, 8:38=A0am, samsloan <samhsl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 7:09 am, "Chess One" <OneCh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "samsloan" <samhsl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:023534e0-c93d-4e97-bbbc-1fa37dea1cd9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > <...>
>
> > > However, most voters know little or nothing about this. Many voted
> > > just on the basis of campaign statements published in Chess Life.
They=
> > > would hardly be expected to know about the serious problems with
> > > everything involving Susan Polgar going back for the past 23 years.
>
> > Or... even your own problems, which go back even further?
>
> > > They would not know that the problems Polgar has been creating here
> > > are almost identical to the problems she created back in Hungary
> > > before she got here.
>
> > Pu****ng the limits of the game to involve more players, eliminating
> > gender-bias from the inside, by actually encouraging self esteem in
youn=
g
> > women, as if they were people too?
>
> > Those sort of problems?
>
> > People are terrified that the precious balance of the status quo will
be=
> > upset, that new criteria will apply, and a necessary transparency in
che=
ss
> > governance will actually be carried out rather than suggested -
=A0that =
the
> > USCF will actually do something to justify its existence, rather than
> > continue to decline like a private member's club for the old boys.
>
> > Those factors are very serious problems only for those who like it the
w=
ay
> > it is now. And those people talk about SPICE and KCF exploring their
> > individual paths forward as a 'rift', since it ain't a monolithic
approa=
ch,
> > which in their opinion should run everything [down].
>
> > Phil Innes
>
> Do you feel that by posting thousands of obscene and ****ographic
> messages from "The Fake Sam Sloan" and by posting similar obscene
> messages on her own blog athttp://www.susanpolgar.blogspot.com,
> Susan Polgar has been "eliminating gender-bias from the inside". Do
> you feel that her personal attacks on rival female chess grandmasters
> has helped by "actually encouraging self esteem in young women"?
>
> If you have such strong opinions on this subject, why do not you
> actually come up with some money and join the USCF? Why is it that her
> biggest sup****ters and our biggest critics are non-members such as
> Phil Innes, Rob Mitchell and Taylor Kingston?
Sam, where do you get the idea that I'm a sup****ter of the USCF? I
am more or less neutral about and uninterested in the USCF. The only
sense in which I could be characterized as "sup****ting the USCF" is
that I have always opposed you being on their Board of Directors. But
then, I would oppose your election as a director of pretty much
anything.
BTW, I am sorry to hear of the rift between the Spice Girls and
Kentucky Fried Chicken.
|
