On Apr 30, 7:38=A0am, samsloan <samhsl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 7:09 am, "Chess One" <OneCh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "samsloan" <samhsl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:023534e0-c93d-4e97-bbbc-1fa37dea1cd9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > <...>
>
> > > However, most voters know little or nothing about this. Many voted
> > > just on the basis of campaign statements published in Chess Life.
They=
> > > would hardly be expected to know about the serious problems with
> > > everything involving Susan Polgar going back for the past 23 years.
>
> > Or... even your own problems, which go back even further?
>
> > > They would not know that the problems Polgar has been creating here
> > > are almost identical to the problems she created back in Hungary
> > > before she got here.
>
> > Pu****ng the limits of the game to involve more players, eliminating
> > gender-bias from the inside, by actually encouraging self esteem in
youn=
g
> > women, as if they were people too?
>
> > Those sort of problems?
>
> > People are terrified that the precious balance of the status quo will
be=
> > upset, that new criteria will apply, and a necessary transparency in
che=
ss
> > governance will actually be carried out rather than suggested -
=A0that =
the
> > USCF will actually do something to justify its existence, rather than
> > continue to decline like a private member's club for the old boys.
>
> > Those factors are very serious problems only for those who like it the
w=
ay
> > it is now. And those people talk about SPICE and KCF exploring their
> > individual paths forward as a 'rift', since it ain't a monolithic
approa=
ch,
> > which in their opinion should run everything [down].
>
> > Phil Innes
>
> Do you feel that by posting thousands of obscene and ****ographic
> messages from "The Fake Sam Sloan" and by posting similar obscene
> messages on her own blog athttp://www.susanpolgar.blogspot.com,
> Susan Polgar has been "eliminating gender-bias from the inside". Do
> you feel that her personal attacks on rival female chess grandmasters
> has helped by "actually encouraging self esteem in young women"?
>
> If you have such strong opinions on this subject, why do not you
> actually come up with some money and join the USCF? Why is it that her
> biggest sup****ters and our biggest critics are non-members such as
> Phil Innes, Rob Mitchell and Taylor Kingston? If you are so interested
> in the welfare of the USCF (instead of trying to destroy it which is
> what you seem to be trying to do) why not join our organization?
>
> Sam Sloan- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
You are attacking Taylor Kingston? What has he done to you?Are you
saying that anyone who says they are NOT against Susan must be against
you?(Because we all know it and everything in God's universe is all
about you!)
Actually her biggest sup****ters are USCF members. They are the same
ones who voted you out of office.LOL
|
