On Apr 23, 11:14 am, jeremy.p.spinrad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>If the fake Sam Sloan posts were by Truong
>If the fake Sam Sloan posts were not by Truong
>I think that it is absurd to justify this on the basis of posing a
>danger as a chess coach. I believe lots of children have been coached
>by Polgar, and there have been no incidents. I would have no problem
>sending my own children for such coaching
Good. Maybe you are not as much of an idiot as we thought you to be?
Now go one step farther. Would you send your own daughter to Sam Sloan
for "such coaching"? What Opening would Coach Sam Sloan then explore?
Do you think he would try the Spike? I think it could be Open Game as
we all know Sam's standard Gambit. Could it be a Minority Attack?
>take the high moral ground [...] it will be good [...] for your image
>the morally correct thing to do
By your association of Sam Sloan with these qualities or op****tunities,
Spinrad, do you reveal yourself for the low cur you are?
If not that Paul has the wisdom of the sage, temperament of the saint
and forgiveness of the messiah, the score would have long been settled
in the old way. Sam would be talking to his fathers, and not fathering
more bastards who the rest of us pay taxes to feed, clothe, house and
educate.
You are becoming more and more like Ray Gordon, Spinrad, shooting off
about matters of which you are ignorant. One might well listen to the
Ray Gordon (0-15 score in court) take on family court law questions
(his chance of procreating being nil) as listen to you advising about
the "high moral ground".
|
