Re: "Kasparov Retains Title on a Draw":

<parrthenon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fe288e83-da21-4a01-9b68-9b49b6af565c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> DON'T BLAME KASPAROV!
>
> "I don't know how it's possible to win two matches in a row. I did it,
> but I still don't know how I did it." -- Gary Kasparov who voluntarily
> renounced the rematch clause.
>
> FIDE is to blame. Both Botvinnik and Karpov enjoyed even greater
> advantages than Kasparov.
>

Dubious accuracy, of course.

As far as I can tell, Karpov is the only World Champion
in the FIDE era to play a title defense with *no* advantage (twice
with Korchnoi, once vs. Kasparov) Ironically, if Karpov
had been the beneficiary of Fischer's "win-by-two" condition,
he would have defeated Kasparov in their first match.

Kasparov's manipulations to keep the title by leaving
FIDE are well known. They may not be historically
out of line with champion's behavior pre-FIDE, but
neither it is anything to boast about. He played just
two title defenses in a 10-year period.