"Ray Gordon, court jester" <ray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:L8GdndmUIJt995LVnZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Wrong nitwit. If this is a custody matter and the NY court had
>> jurisdiction
>> originally it retains exclusive continuing jurisdiction no matter where
>> they move.
>
> Namecaller,
>
> Nothing can happen in Texas without the approval of the Texas courts.
> State courts generally ignore orders from other states that violate
their
> own state laws.
>
He's right. Unless there is an agreement between the parties to move the
case to a different jurisdiction, it would stay in the NY Courts. Anyone
that has experience with family court knows that. The reason you don't,
is
because you have never had to deal with child custody matters. Texas has
nothing to do with a child custody case that is open in NY. As long as
they
are minors, the jurisdiction remains in NY.
Don't make the mistake of believing that the rules you think you know in
court, even apply in family court. They look out for the welfare of the
child, and they don't care who's toes they step on. Additionally, if you
get crossways with the judge in family court, you are nearly screwed
because
the court has wide descretion, and very little legal oversight. Anyone
that
has been involved in a child custody case is laughing at your ignorance.
Fortunately for the Human Race, you are not likely to reproduce....so we
won't have to listen to you whine about how you got screwed by a wrongful
Fascist judge....like you did in the UPenn case when they wanted you to go
and get your brain fixed....
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
|
