On Apr 20, 9:08 am, "parrthe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <parrthe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> SO WHAT?
>
> >About the many terrible threats and abuse Susan's children are
suffering....> -- Brian Lafferty
>
> This posting by Brian Lafferty gives me a chance
> to talk about an earlier attack on Truong and
> Polgar over the treatment of Susan's children.
>
> Once again, I did not like the practice of
> intruding into home life by a court being used as
> a ploy to degrade Truong-Polgar.
>
> Yours, Larry Parr
Larry Parr is missing the big case:
It is known and the sisters have confessed that Papa Polgar used to
beat them to force them to play chess and study chess and it was
living Hell to live in that home where they were not allowed to go out
and associate and play with other kids their ages. Of course, this is
what made them great chess players. Otherwise, they would be working
as office secretaries somewhere today.
And now, Susan Polgar is applying to her children the same techniques
that were applied to her, forcing her kids to play chess. Problem is
that her kids are boys who are often not as compliant as girls and the
youngest one does not like chess and has complained to the
authorities.
What Larry Parr is missing is the big Texas case going on right now
where 416 children were taken from their parents and put into foster
care solely and entirely because their families were living in or
associated with a polygamous life style:
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_8989851
These 416 are in most cases refugees who escaped when a similar
compound was raided along the Arizona Utah border.
In the vast majority of countries and societies of the world polygamy
was practiced and in most cases still is. Here in the US it is not
allowed. We only have girlfriends.
I am sure you have lots of it over in Malaysia where you are. How many
wives do you have, by the way? Just wondering.
I have been doing research on my family history and I have found three
instances of my ancestors who had an unusually large number of
children.
All of them lived in the 1700s. None of them were related to each
other. None of them were involved in any funny religions. They were
all straight-line Methodists or Presbyterians. Some were preachers.
One of these was Andrew Graham who arrived in America in 1772. He was
married four times. Three of his wives were named Margaret. He has
more than 7,000 descendants alive today, which may explain why there
are so many people nowadays named Graham.
I have a book out about this:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891072
My research tends to show that most men had no children at all and a
few men had very large numbers of children, some men producing more
than 20 children.
My question is: Would the human race have survived at all and would
any of us be alive today had it not been for those few men who
produced large numbers of children?
The other question is: Some would say that Polgar is guilty of beating
his kids to force them to play chess. Suppose he beat the kids to
force them to learn their math tables or to do their homework or to
practice the piano. Would he still be considered guilty?
Sam Sloan
|
