Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.

Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> Peter Osterlund wrote:
>> Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>
>>> Sanny wrote:
>>>
>>>> That game was played by EASY level. Heres a game by Advance Level
>>>> where Zebediah gave lots of sacrifices and win the game in just 34
>>>> moves.
>>>>
>>>> In this game Zebediah was a knight ahead but later sacrificed its
>>>> knight to bring a quick end.
>
>>> You mean that Getclub gifted him a knight and then played like a
>>> patzer. This play is basically insane. There is something wrong with
>>> either the evaluation function or the search algorithm.
>>
>> I think the quiescence search is either not implemented at all or
>> somehow broken.
>
> My instinct too. Some moves are otherwise inexplicable.
>
>> Just for fun, I played a game between GetClub (running
>> on a 2.4GHz Core2 CPU) and my mobile phone (I think it has a 400MHz
>> ARM CPU). I expected my phone to be tactically outplayed, but the
>> exact opposite happened. Here is the game:
>
> Looking at Shredders computer analysis it is clear that the mobile
> phone always had a deeper effective search than GetClub.
> About what nominal rating is Glofiish chess?

The phone runs Windows Mobile 6 and I installed CEBoard and a PocketPC
version of crafty. The program analyzes about 15k nodes/s. I don't
know what rating that translates to, but it's about 500 times slower
than crafty running on my desktop PC.

-- 
Peter Osterlund - petero2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]