Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Chess software > Re: Help Bot Ad...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 18 of 35 Topic 6704 of 6898
Post > Topic >>

Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.

by Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 09:22 AM

Peter Osterlund wrote:
> Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> 
>> Sanny wrote:
>>
>>> That game was played by EASY level. Heres a game by Advance Level
>>> where Zebediah gave lots of sacrifices and win the game in just 34
>>> moves.
>>>
>>> In this game Zebediah was a knight ahead but later sacrificed its
>>> knight to bring a quick end.

>> You mean that Getclub gifted him a knight and then played like a
>> patzer. This play is basically insane. There is something wrong with
>> either the evaluation function or the search algorithm.
> 
> I think the quiescence search is either not implemented at all or
> somehow broken.

My instinct too. Some moves are otherwise inexplicable.

> Just for fun, I played a game between GetClub (running
> on a 2.4GHz Core2 CPU) and my mobile phone (I think it has a 400MHz
> ARM CPU). I expected my phone to be tactically outplayed, but the
> exact opposite happened. Here is the game:

Looking at Shredders computer analysis it is clear that the mobile phone 
always had a deeper effective search than GetClub.
About what nominal rating is Glofiish chess?
> 
> [White "GetClub beginner level 10-20s/move"]
> [Black "Glofiish X800, 15s/move"]
> [Result "0-1"]

Yippee! Header data that will im****t into a CB chess engine..
> 
> 1. Nc3 d5 2. d4 Nf6 3. Bf4 e6 4. g3 Bb4 5. Bg2 Ne4 6. Bxe4 dxe4 

You have to wonder why it played BxN - cramping your own position is not 
usually a good idea. I wonder if it thought 7. Nxe4 was possible (ie did 
not see that the N was pinned in calculating the exchange)

Something harmless to continue developing like Bd2 would have been fine.

>7. e3 g5 8. Be5
> O-O 9. g4 Nc6 10. Bg3 e5

GetClub is steadily outplayed by an engine that sees deeper here.

10. a3 would be a better continuation. The line played helps black.

> 11. d5 Ne7 12. Bxe5 Nxd5 13. Qe2 Re8

We have to wonder why it thought 13. Qe2 was a good idea. It isn't.
h3,h4,a3,Kf1 would all be better (the position is already lost)

> 14. f4 exf3

ANother helpmate move. Not quite terminal but it greatly assists black.
I think a3 is obviously best with Bd4 or even O-O-O plausible.

> 15. Nxf3 Bxc3+ 16. bxc3 Bxg4 17. Bd4 c5 

17. c4 looks better to me.

>18. Bxc5 Nf4 19. Qf1 Qd5 

Qd2 is better

>20. Nxg5 Ng2+
> 21. Kf2 Qxc5 22. Kxg2 Qxg5 23. h4 Bf3+ 

OK. This position needs careful examination. The only viable move here 
is Rg1 and I would expect most engines to find it. Anything else leads 
inexorably to a mate. h4 is a mate in 10.

Interestingly this particular position produces one of the widest 
spectrums of mate detected cutoffs I have seen from Shredder. Does 
anyone know how to interpret them?
namely at 18 ply overnight infinite analysis
Rg1 -11.4
Qg1 -#211
e4  -#201
Qc1, Re1 -#177
h4  -#176
h3,Qd3 -#175
Qf4 -#172
Qe1, Qf2, Qe2 -#150
Qf3 -#149
(all the others are resolved to very quick mates)

NB it is odd that h4 stays at -#176 at 18 ply although after playing 
"h4" explicitly the engine quickly finds the mate in 10.

> 24. Kf2 Qxe3+ 25. Kg3 Bc6+ 26. Kh2 Qe5+
> 27. Kh3 Qe6+ 28. Kg3 Qd6+ 0-1

I presume here that beginner level resigned when the mate came within 
its event horizon (which seems surprisingly shallow).
> 
> I guess that beginner level isn't intentionally making bad moves,
> therefore my guess is a broken quiescence search.

I am not sure. It is hard to decide what it thinks it is doing.

> Sanny <softtanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> 
>>>> 6. e2-e4{104} Nf6-e4{1978}
>>> And now the final coup de grace. Suicide chess anyone ???

>> No it gives 2 points for killing 2 Center pawns and other 1 point for
>> white King Comming out unprotected. and Look at White position its
>> none of the pieces is developed.

Sanny what is the granularity of your evaluation function? You keep 
talking about integral numbers of pawns as if that is the finest division.
> 
> Why a whole point for the unprotected king? Wouldn't a smaller value,
> like 0.25 be better?

That is probably about right. Unless there is a forcing mate sequence - 
some tricks for quickly breaking open a castled king rely on rook 
sacrifice followed by a forcing sequence of checks to mate.

Regards,
Martin Brown
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**
 




 35 Posts in Topic:
Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-02 22:56:16 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-03 12:04:42 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-03 22:16:59 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-03 23:01:49 
Help Bot Advice adopted.
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-03 23:48:47 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-04 00:23:46 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Martin Brown <|||newsp  2008-05-08 09:37:02 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
zzz <ik_ben_piet_snot@  2008-05-04 10:40:38 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-04 10:50:26 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-04 20:38:25 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-04 21:01:49 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
Martin Brown <|||newsp  2008-05-07 12:30:51 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-07 09:38:44 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-07 14:40:17 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-08 22:19:06 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Martin Brown <|||newsp  2008-05-09 10:14:25 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Peter Osterlund <peter  2008-05-11 08:58:41 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Martin Brown <|||newsp  2008-05-12 09:22:57 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Peter Osterlund <peter  2008-05-12 16:01:33 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-09 00:45:27 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
"chipschap@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-09 08:18:00 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-09 09:57:41 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Patrick Volk <pjvolk@[  2008-05-11 18:15:36 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Martin Brown <|||newsp  2008-05-12 08:38:04 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Patrick Volk <pjvolk@[  2008-05-12 23:05:33 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-09 13:48:13 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-09 21:54:34 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Martin Brown <|||newsp  2008-05-10 14:37:23 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-09 23:27:06 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
"Wlodzimierz Holszty  2008-05-09 23:30:54 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
"Wlodzimierz Holszty  2008-05-10 01:15:32 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
help bot <nomorechess@  2008-05-10 03:05:32 
Re: Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze?
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-10 04:32:18 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Sanny <softtanks@[EMAI  2008-05-11 21:21:23 
Re: Help Bot Advice adopted.
Peter Osterlund <peter  2008-05-12 04:32:07 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 3:07:50 CDT 2008.