Re: Trademarks (again)

"Guy Macon" <http://www.guymacon.com/>
wrote in message 
news:8s6dnW8bqeLpR5DV4p2dnAA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Here, once again, is the reasoning behind the above claim.
> If you disagree, please state why.  The last time you just
> went silent, only to surface later with the same wrong ideas
> about how trademarks are established.

This is Mr. Richerby's modus operandi. Demonstrate
that his bluster is false and he goes silent.

That would be OK (if a little immature), but then
he brings the same false arguments out a little
later.