On Apr 22, 1:53 am, Sanny <softta...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > I once saw a USCF master get killed in this
> > very same line, but he had the White side and
> > his attack on the dark squares was botched
> > horribly.
>
> Yes this line is very dangerous. What is the Correct sequence of move.
> And which was the wrong move by Advance Level?
One fellow who played this bought an openings book
written by a grandmaster, which he said advised avoiding
this ultra-sharp line and instead transposing into the
backward-pawn line where White goes: Nb5 d6, Bg5 a6,
Bxf6 gxf6, Na3.
The losing move in this game was, perhaps, 7. ...Qc7.
(But capturing early on c3 with the Bishop was not
advisable.)
> > I wonder why Zeb keeps giving the stronger
> > program White? Maybe he lacks the patience
> > for a week-long game.
>
> What about the game you started wirh Advance Level?
>
> Who is winning. Have you managed to get equality with Advance Level or
> any of your pieces have gone by the Big Triumph.
The program only moves about once an hour, so
It's dragging on. My "attack" failed, except that I
managed to get a lot of pieces traded and am now
in a relatively simple ending, with passed pawns
galore. No way can they *all* be stopped, unless
I blunder again. I messed up and allowed my
connected passed pawns to get separated by
some strange combination I did not foresee.
> You need not worry as you will just loose +2 points if you lost the
> game and earn +40 points if you manage to win the game.
Yes, well... that computer-operator dude, Zeb,
has already taken down the Advance level twice,
while I'm still playing the very same game as when
he was beating the Master level, over and over.
-- help bot
|
