Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Wanting to ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 20 Topic 8691 of 9389
Post > Topic >>

Re: Wanting to learn KS

by Michael Angelo Ravera <maravera@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 1, 2008 at 11:33 PM

On May 25, 1:50=A0pm, henrysun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 25, 1:18 pm, Michael AngeloRavera<marav...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 12, 4:56 pm, Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > There've been several posts recently mentioning Kaplan-Sheinwold and
> > > Roth-Stone. It sounds as if KS might be a system that would fit my
> > > style, but I'm not at all familiar with it. Can anyone point me to a
> > > good reference for KS, or summarize the general philosophy? I'm not
as=

> > > interested in RS, but since they seem to be mentioned together
fairly
> > > often perhaps I should take a look at both anyway.
>
> > > Obviously I have tried to look around on Google, but there seem to
be
> > > varying descriptions: perhaps "snapshots" from what KS was at a
> > > particular time? I am hoping for something I could read and absorb,
th=
en
> > > sit down with some RGBer and say "let's play KS", and be mostly on
the=

> > > same wavelength.
>
> > The basics of KS and TOWELE are the same. I forget if the original KS
> > used Strong (and many of us do) or weak (as many others do) immediate
> > jump ****fts by Responder.
>
> > K-S didn't have Bergen Raises or Inverted Majors, since Marty hadn't
> > yet learned to play Bridge when the system was defined and Kokish
> > barely had.
>
> > K-S originally had "controlled psyches" (occasional 5-7HCP 1-level
> > openers) which are illegal today (under the "King or more below
> > average strength" prohibition)
>
> > However, K-S did form the much of the foundation for what I call
> > "Modern US" bidding: Weak 1NT, Sound 1m openers, 2/1 FG, Weak 2s, STR
> > F ART 2C, and, I believe, Negative Doubles.
>
> > I often say that the fact the Charlie Goren got the Broadcast Video
> > (what they then called "TV") gig, set back US bidding by about 30
> > years.
>
> Michael,
>
> I believe you are mistaken on a couple of points.
>
> First, KS never included weak jump ****fts. =A0In fact, they used strong
> jump ****fts as psychic controls (the cheaper of NT or the opened suit
> showed a psyche).

I said that I wasn't sure about the Weak Jump ****fts.


>
> Second, if by "inverted majors" you really meant "inverted minors,"
> then KS included those from the start. =A0If by "inverted majors" you
> are referring to the Roth-Stone forcing raise showing, in essence, a
> limit raise, then you are correct.

I did leave inverted minors off the list of K-S innovations although I
play them and believe that K-S did. "Inverted Majors" were definitiely
NOT one of K-S's innovations. I did mention them in the same constext
as Bergen raises. 1M-2M shows an invitational hand. 1M-3M is
preemptive. If your definition includes anything in between, you run
it through F1NT. I believe that they are a third millenium invention.



>
> Third, the KS controlled psyche was defined as a suit at least as good
> as the QTxx in a balanced hand of 2-6 hcps that could not stand the
> lead of any other suit. =A06 points is, in fact, probably too strong for
> a controlled psyche, but I assume K and S were including a hand like
>
> xxx
> xxx
> xxx
> AQxx
>
> as the maximum possible hand, with
>
> xxx
> xxx
> xxx
> QTxx
>
> as the minimum hand.
>
> Finally, historically, KS picked up the 5-card majors, forcing 1nt,
> and strong 2/1 responses from Roth and Stone, as they acknowledge in
> the 1958 edition of their system book. =A0To that extent, they are
> followers of R-S, and it is R-S who should be given credit for laying
> the foundation for most of what p***** for 2/1 bidding, especially as
> it gets filtered through Goldman's early versions of Aces Scientific.
>
> BTW, what does TOWELE stand for? =A0I don't recall ever seeing that
> acronym before.

TOWELE is "Two over One, Weak Everything, Light Everything"
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
Wanting to learn KS
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-05-12 16:56:25 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
alvin <apbluthman@[EMA  2008-05-12 17:15:22 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 17:18:49 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl  2008-05-12 20:19:41 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Otis Bricker <obricker  2008-05-13 10:28:06 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-12 17:37:50 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Nick France <gandalfnf  2008-05-13 07:48:43 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-13 09:24:07 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-05-13 12:42:47 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Ron Johnson <johnson@[  2008-05-15 12:12:13 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Adam Wildavsky <adam@[  2008-05-25 09:15:05 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-25 12:36:00 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Michael Angelo Ravera <  2008-05-25 13:18:35 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-25 13:50:12 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Rob Morris <rm445@[EMA  2008-05-25 22:05:19 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Tim <thg@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-25 14:03:56 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Michael Angelo Ravera <  2008-06-01 23:33:12 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[  2008-06-02 11:37:41 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-06-02 13:31:20 
Re: Wanting to learn KS
Steve Willner <swillne  2008-06-14 14:10:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Sep 5 11:28:10 CDT 2008.