Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Responding ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 31 Topic 8683 of 9048
Post > Topic >>

Re: Responding to weak two

by CBFalconer <cbfalconer@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 10:50 PM

raija d wrote:
> "raija d" <mustikka@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> All white, online IMPs indy, first hand with unknown partner from
>> Poland on BBO  Self-rating was Expert, but as we all know it does
>> not mean anything. [Well, if he were from a certain other country,
>> I would know it means he is intermediate at best...]
>>
>> (P) 2S (P) ?
>>
>> Your have VOID-J10xxxxx-xx-10xxx.  Assume you would Pass as I did.
>>
>> (P) 2S (P) P
>> (X)  P  (P) ?
>>
>> Pass again or what?
> 
> I did not dare bid hearts as I somehow got vibes (even online...!)
> that my partner was an idiot, mainly by reading how he had written
> his stats in a manner that a "real" player would not write them.  I
> am pretty sure that if I had bid hearts after the Dbl was left in,
> he would not leave it in hearts. Of course nothing gained if nothing
> risked and I should have bid 3H and see if he knows to pass it.
> 
> Opener had QJxxx-x-xxx-Qxxx and 2SX was of course a disaster as you
> all knew.  I thought that without discussion and assuming SAYC or
> some sort of 'standard' in an indy, absent any discussion, the 2S
> opener would be a little more traditional, second seat of all things! 
> 3HX would have gone for -probable -500 while 2SX was -800.  Somehow
> the opponents allowed partner to score 4 tricks.  He said it was
> multi...so Art was clever to suspect that.

So what?  Your partner should still be cackling over what a success
he scored.  Looking at your two hands, is there any doubt that 6 of
a minor is cold for the enemy (maybe seven).  That is worth at
least 900 points.  I proposed this a few minutes ago in my original
answer to your first posting.

-- 
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) 
 [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
            Try the download section.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-11 08:18:28 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 08:31:43 
Re: Responding to weak two
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 22:41:21 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-11 08:46:14 
Re: Responding to weak two
"Art Hoffman" &  2008-05-11 12:40:25 
Re: Responding to weak two
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 20:02:09 
Re: Responding to weak two
grbridgeREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL  2008-05-11 21:04:45 
Re: Responding to weak two
Nick France <gandalfnf  2008-05-11 14:07:59 
Re: Responding to weak two
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-11 17:41:10 
Re: Responding to weak two
"John R. Mayne"  2008-05-11 17:35:58 
Re: Responding to weak two
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-05-11 17:42:26 
Re: Responding to weak two
ted <morristed@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 18:31:49 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 18:48:31 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-11 20:03:56 
Re: Responding to weak two
"John R. Mayne"  2008-05-11 20:56:16 
Re: Responding to weak two
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-05-12 02:48:08 
Re: Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-11 21:41:55 
Re: Responding to weak two
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-11 23:19:06 
Re: Responding to weak two
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 22:50:15 
Re: Responding to weak two
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-11 22:14:12 
Re: Responding to weak two
"Lorne" <lor  2008-05-12 20:00:19 
Re: Responding to weak two
susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 17:28:16 
Re: Responding to weak two
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-05-12 17:40:57 
Re: Responding to weak two
susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 17:47:06 
Re: Responding to weak two
Bill Jacobs <bill.jaco  2008-05-13 04:06:29 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 21:13:20 
Re: Responding to weak two
gazelle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-24 15:14:09 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-12 21:30:46 
Re: Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-12 23:30:25 
Re: Responding to weak two
ted <morristed@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 16:25:34 
Re: Responding to weak two
Free <fstaelens@[EMAIL  2008-05-13 02:57:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Jul 9 10:02:05 CDT 2008.