Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Responding ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 31 Topic 8683 of 9135
Post > Topic >>

Re: Responding to weak two

by CBFalconer <cbfalconer@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 10:41 PM

henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> "raija d" <musti...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> All white, online IMPs indy, first hand with unknown partner from
>> Poland on BBO  Self-rating was Expert, but as we all know it does
>> not mean anything. [Well, if he were from a certain other country,
>> I would know it means he is intermediate at best...]
>>
>> (P) 2S (P) ?
>>
>> Your have VOID-J10xxxxx-xx-10xxx.  Assume you would Pass as I did.
>>
>> (P) 2S (P) P
>> (X)  P  (P) ?
>>
>> Pass again or what?
> 
> If partner is unknown, I'd tend to let him stew in his own juices.
> 
> Because I have no idea about the opponents' equity in this deal
> (-920? -980? -460), I am unwilling to risk an extra -300 by running
> to 3h even though spades are known to be breaking badly and hearts
> are not known yet.

I agree, but I think it is simpler than that.  If partner has a
weak 2 bid, and I hold the above, the enemy must have a slam.  You
want to buy the hand at any one of your partner****ps long suits. 
Cheap.

-- 
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) 
 [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
            Try the download section.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-11 08:18:28 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 08:31:43 
Re: Responding to weak two
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 22:41:21 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-11 08:46:14 
Re: Responding to weak two
"Art Hoffman" &  2008-05-11 12:40:25 
Re: Responding to weak two
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 20:02:09 
Re: Responding to weak two
grbridgeREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL  2008-05-11 21:04:45 
Re: Responding to weak two
Nick France <gandalfnf  2008-05-11 14:07:59 
Re: Responding to weak two
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-11 17:41:10 
Re: Responding to weak two
"John R. Mayne"  2008-05-11 17:35:58 
Re: Responding to weak two
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-05-11 17:42:26 
Re: Responding to weak two
ted <morristed@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 18:31:49 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 18:48:31 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-11 20:03:56 
Re: Responding to weak two
"John R. Mayne"  2008-05-11 20:56:16 
Re: Responding to weak two
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-05-12 02:48:08 
Re: Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-11 21:41:55 
Re: Responding to weak two
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-11 23:19:06 
Re: Responding to weak two
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 22:50:15 
Re: Responding to weak two
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-11 22:14:12 
Re: Responding to weak two
"Lorne" <lor  2008-05-12 20:00:19 
Re: Responding to weak two
susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 17:28:16 
Re: Responding to weak two
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-05-12 17:40:57 
Re: Responding to weak two
susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 17:47:06 
Re: Responding to weak two
Bill Jacobs <bill.jaco  2008-05-13 04:06:29 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 21:13:20 
Re: Responding to weak two
gazelle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-24 15:14:09 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-12 21:30:46 
Re: Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-12 23:30:25 
Re: Responding to weak two
ted <morristed@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 16:25:34 
Re: Responding to weak two
Free <fstaelens@[EMAIL  2008-05-13 02:57:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 2:56:15 CDT 2008.