Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Responding ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 23 of 31 Topic 8683 of 9096
Post > Topic >>

Re: Responding to weak two

by Alan Malloy <alan.NO.SPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 05:40 PM

On 5/12/2008 5:28 PM, susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 12, 3:18 am, "raija d" <musti...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> All white, online IMPs indy, first hand with unknown partner from
Poland on
>> BBO  Self-rating was Expert, but as we all know it does not mean
anything.
>> [Well, if he were from a certain other country, I would know it means
he is
>> intermediate at best...]
>>
>> (P) 2S (P) ?
>>
>> Your have VOID-J10xxxxx-xx-10xxx.  Assume you would Pass as I did.
>>
>> (P) 2S (P) P
>> (X)  P  (P) ?
>>
>> Pass again or what?
> 
> 3H, not very close. Auto at mps of course,  main danger is the opps
> now bidding 7d, but they are much more likely to double in tempo

I think 7D-4 is more likely than 7D making, as the defense may get a 
major-suit crossruff going. Not likely, sure, but way more likely than 
that they can make 7D. If partner's hand is QTxxxx x xx QJxx, then it's 
true they might make. But if he is holding this, it is hard to envision 
a holding for third hand that is willing to play for two-level penalty 
when 7D can be made opposite a passed partner.

-- 
Cheers,
     Alan (San Jose, California, USA)
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-11 08:18:28 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 08:31:43 
Re: Responding to weak two
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 22:41:21 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-11 08:46:14 
Re: Responding to weak two
"Art Hoffman" &  2008-05-11 12:40:25 
Re: Responding to weak two
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 20:02:09 
Re: Responding to weak two
grbridgeREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL  2008-05-11 21:04:45 
Re: Responding to weak two
Nick France <gandalfnf  2008-05-11 14:07:59 
Re: Responding to weak two
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-11 17:41:10 
Re: Responding to weak two
"John R. Mayne"  2008-05-11 17:35:58 
Re: Responding to weak two
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-05-11 17:42:26 
Re: Responding to weak two
ted <morristed@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 18:31:49 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 18:48:31 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-11 20:03:56 
Re: Responding to weak two
"John R. Mayne"  2008-05-11 20:56:16 
Re: Responding to weak two
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-05-12 02:48:08 
Re: Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-11 21:41:55 
Re: Responding to weak two
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-11 23:19:06 
Re: Responding to weak two
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 22:50:15 
Re: Responding to weak two
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-11 22:14:12 
Re: Responding to weak two
"Lorne" <lor  2008-05-12 20:00:19 
Re: Responding to weak two
susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 17:28:16 
Re: Responding to weak two
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-05-12 17:40:57 
Re: Responding to weak two
susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 17:47:06 
Re: Responding to weak two
Bill Jacobs <bill.jaco  2008-05-13 04:06:29 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 21:13:20 
Re: Responding to weak two
gazelle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-24 15:14:09 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-12 21:30:46 
Re: Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-12 23:30:25 
Re: Responding to weak two
ted <morristed@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 16:25:34 
Re: Responding to weak two
Free <fstaelens@[EMAIL  2008-05-13 02:57:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 18 23:13:40 CDT 2008.