Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Responding ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 22 of 31 Topic 8683 of 9134
 Post > Topic >>

Re: Responding to weak two

by susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 12, 2008 at 05:28 PM

On May 12, 3:18=A0am, "raija d" <musti...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> All white, online IMPs indy, first hand with unknown partner from Poland
o=
n
> BBO =A0Self-rating was Expert, but as we all know it does not mean
anythin=
g.
> [Well, if he were from a certain other country, I would know it means he
i=
s
> intermediate at best...]
>
> (P) 2S (P) ?
>
> Your have VOID-J10xxxxx-xx-10xxx. =A0Assume you would Pass as I did.
>
> (P) 2S (P) P
> (X) =A0P =A0(P) ?
>
> Pass again or what?

3H, not very close. Auto at mps of course,  main danger is the opps
now bidding 7d, but they are much more likely to double in tempo




 31 Posts in Topic:
Responding to weak two
 "raija d" <m  2008-05-11 08:18:28 
Re: Responding to weak two
 henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 08:31:43 
Re: Responding to weak two
 CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 22:41:21 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-11 08:46:14 
Re: Responding to weak two
 "Art Hoffman" &  2008-05-11 12:40:25 
Re: Responding to weak two
 vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 20:02:09 
Re: Responding to weak two
 grbridgeREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL  2008-05-11 21:04:45 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Nick France <gandalfnf  2008-05-11 14:07:59 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-11 17:41:10 
Re: Responding to weak two
 "John R. Mayne"  2008-05-11 17:35:58 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-05-11 17:42:26 
Re: Responding to weak two
 ted <morristed@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 18:31:49 
Re: Responding to weak two
 henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 18:48:31 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-11 20:03:56 
Re: Responding to weak two
 "John R. Mayne"  2008-05-11 20:56:16 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-05-12 02:48:08 
Re: Responding to weak two
 "raija d" <m  2008-05-11 21:41:55 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-11 23:19:06 
Re: Responding to weak two
 CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 22:50:15 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-11 22:14:12 
Re: Responding to weak two
 "Lorne" <lor  2008-05-12 20:00:19 
Re: Responding to weak two
 susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 17:28:16 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-05-12 17:40:57 
Re: Responding to weak two
 susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 17:47:06 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Bill Jacobs <bill.jaco  2008-05-13 04:06:29 
Re: Responding to weak two
 henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 21:13:20 
Re: Responding to weak two
 gazelle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-24 15:14:09 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-12 21:30:46 
Re: Responding to weak two
 "raija d" <m  2008-05-12 23:30:25 
Re: Responding to weak two
 ted <morristed@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 16:25:34 
Re: Responding to weak two
 Free <fstaelens@[EMAIL  2008-05-13 02:57:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 20:59:17 CDT 2008.