Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Good thing ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 18 of 22 Topic 8690 of 9136
Post > Topic >>

Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money

by vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 12, 2008 at 01:37 PM

6NT unless you're playing imp pairs.  In imp pairs I would try for
grand.

henrysun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> You hold, playing opposite Steven:
>
> AQxxx
> KQx
> Jx
> Kxx
>
> Because you believe that Edgar is right, and that opening 1nt with a 5-
> card major is one of the unforgiveable sins, you decide to open 1S.
>
> Steven surprises you by making a strong jump ****ft to 3d.  You rebid
> 3s to show your extra quality (5 to 2 of the top 3 honors) and Steven
> rebids 3nt.
>
> Do you
>
> (1) pass, playing for the sure plus and making the last mistake now?
> (2) bid 4nt, invitational, and let Steven make the last mistake?
> (3) bid 4nt, asking for key cards in diamonds, and bash to slam,
> making the last mistake yourself?
> (4) bash to slam and make the last mistake yourself?
>
> And how close do you think your decision is?
>
> (1)  Pretty clear:  Even Stig, Boris, and Eric would agree with my bid
> (2)  Kinda clear:  Maybe two out of the above named 3 would agree with
> my bid;
> (3)  It's a tossup:  If only one of the above named 3 would agree, I'd
> be happy
> (4)  Only an idiot would name names like this is a poll.
>
> Henrysun909
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
Good thing we weren't playing for money
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 08:51:54 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
richlp <richlptx@[EMAI  2008-05-12 09:55:18 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-12 14:53:07 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[  2008-05-12 10:00:55 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
StevieTee <stevts@[EMA  2008-05-12 10:08:25 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-12 10:12:16 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Tim <thg@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 10:22:06 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 10:24:39 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Eddie Grove <eddiegrov  2008-05-12 12:43:54 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Nick France <gandalfnf  2008-05-12 10:26:50 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl  2008-05-12 13:57:43 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
"Thomas Dehn" &  2008-05-12 20:12:38 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
"Art Hoffman" &  2008-05-12 14:14:42 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
"Lorne" <lor  2008-05-12 19:24:51 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
BBO expert <nym@[EMAIL  2008-05-12 15:46:49 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-12 15:10:12 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-12 14:50:38 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-12 13:37:30 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-12 16:43:04 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bill Jacobs <bill.jaco  2008-05-13 01:26:41 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 23:35:38 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[  2008-05-12 22:31:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 9:54:54 CDT 2008.